Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Andrew Pierson

Hematology & Oncology Boise, ID Medical Doctor

NPI 1992760664 CMS profile 271508

1055 N Curtis Rd, Boise, ID 83706

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$3,821

163 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$19,091 paid to institutions, not to them · program year 2019

Through program year 2025, Andrew Pierson of Boise, ID is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $3,821 across 163 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $19,091 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 55th percentile of Hematology & Oncology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

6 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $698 24
2024 General $1,215 46
2023 General $824 32
2021 General $89 5
2020 General $219 13
2019 General $775 43

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Andrew Pierson
  • Hematology & Oncology median
  • Middle half of Hematology & Oncology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Andrew Pierson were reported at $698. Among 8,769 Hematology & Oncology profiles paid that year, the median was $683 and the middle half received between $143 and $3,154.

Show as a table
Year Andrew Pierson Hematology & Oncology median Middle half National median
2019 $775 $529 $121–$2,516 $163
2020 $219 $339 $82–$2,213 $114
2021 $89 $263 $49–$1,965 $132
2022 $0 $416 $103–$2,395 $149
2023 $824 $542 $125–$2,646 $160
2024 $1,215 $692 $141–$3,008 $164
2025 $698 $683 $143–$3,154 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $371 12 payments
  2. Seattle Genetics, Inc. $342 10 payments
  3. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $318 14 payments
  4. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $318 8 payments
  5. Genentech USA, Inc. $226 12 payments
  6. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $225 11 payments
  7. Incyte Corporation $194 5 payments
  8. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $159 7 payments
  9. Celgene Corporation $157 7 payments
  10. Pfizer Inc. $127 8 payments
  11. Other $1,384 69 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $3,408 155 payments
  2. Education $414 8 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. DARZALEX $283 7 payments
  2. OPDIVO $259 10 payments
  3. IMBRUVICA Oncology $177 6 payments
  4. ADCETRIS $163 7 payments
  5. KISQALI $136 7 payments
  6. REBLOZYL $129 5 payments
  7. KEYTRUDA $115 5 payments
  8. IMBRUVICA Oncology $111 6 payments
  9. TECVAYLI $111 1 payment
  10. TECENTRIQ $105 4 payments
  11. Other $2,866 151 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 41 drugs

Part D claims

1,294

Median for Hematology-Oncology: 604

Drug cost

$2,537,688

Median for Hematology-Oncology: $1,306,514

Branded share of claims

31.7%

Median for Hematology-Oncology: 31.6%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Ibrance Palbociclib Brand 32 $477,605
Revlimid Lenalidomide Brand 19 $330,485
Jakafi Ruxolitinib Phosphate Brand 18 $309,556
Nubeqa Darolutamide Brand 22 $294,242
Pomalyst Pomalidomide Brand 13 $226,844
Verzenio Abemaciclib Brand 14 $214,968
Erleada Apalutamide Brand 14 $205,850
Calquence Acalabrutinib Maleate Brand 12 $176,600
Lonsurf Trifluridine/Tipiracil Hcl Brand 12 $106,743
Venclexta Venetoclax Brand 14 $84,926

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 41 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 8,746 Part D prescribers listed as Hematology-Oncology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 16 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$67,335

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

439

Average age 74

Services billed

928

254 women, 185 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 74%
Cancer 54%
Arthritis 47%
Ischemic heart disease 27%
Chronic kidney disease 27%
Diabetes 26%
Depression 24%
COPD 19%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 49 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
OPDIVO
  • E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $130
$130 — —
LYNPARZA
  • Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $49
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $28
$77 — —
PYRUKYND
  • Agios Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $75
$75 — —
DARZALEX
  • Janssen Biotech, Inc. $70
$70 — —
OPDUALAG
  • E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $58
$58 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 49 with Patron

Records

163 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Hematology & Oncology in Idaho

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record