Doctor of Osteopathy Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Ian Qureshi

Hematology & Oncology Nampa, ID Doctor of Osteopathy

NPI 1871934547 CMS profile 2774584

4400 E Flamingo Ave Ste 130, Nampa, ID 83687

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$18,394

246 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$30,791 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2022–2025

Through program year 2025, Ian Qureshi of Nampa, ID is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $18,394 across 246 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $30,791 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 80th percentile of Hematology & Oncology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $671 29
2024 General $6,793 76
2023 General $5,719 54
2022 General $2,885 8
2021 General $782 27
2020 General $415 16
2019 General $1,128 36

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Ian Qureshi
  • Hematology & Oncology median
  • Middle half of Hematology & Oncology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Ian Qureshi were reported at $671. Among 8,769 Hematology & Oncology profiles paid that year, the median was $683 and the middle half received between $143 and $3,154.

Show as a table
Year Ian Qureshi Hematology & Oncology median Middle half National median
2019 $1,128 $529 $121–$2,516 $163
2020 $415 $339 $82–$2,213 $114
2021 $782 $263 $49–$1,965 $132
2022 $2,885 $416 $103–$2,395 $149
2023 $5,719 $542 $125–$2,646 $160
2024 $6,793 $692 $141–$3,008 $164
2025 $671 $683 $143–$3,154 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $9,974 22 payments
  2. Servier Pharmaceuticals LLC $1,760 1 payment
  3. Array BioPharma Inc. $658 2 payments
  4. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $472 15 payments
  5. Seattle Genetics, Inc. $462 9 payments
  6. Pfizer Inc. $455 26 payments
  7. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $429 18 payments
  8. Celgene Corporation $411 10 payments
  9. Incyte Corporation $343 7 payments
  10. Amgen Inc. $264 5 payments
  11. Other $3,165 131 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Consulting Fee $12,043 7 payments
  2. Food and Beverage $5,230 223 payments
  3. Education $921 15 payments
  4. Honoraria $200 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. ENHERTU $2,461 2 payments
  2. IMJUDO $2,055 2 payments
  3. TIBSOVO $1,840 2 payments
  4. BRAFTOVI $658 2 payments
  5. OPDIVO $353 8 payments
  6. ERLEADA $233 6 payments
  7. KEYTRUDA $217 11 payments
  8. JAKAFI $215 5 payments
  9. DARZALEX $207 6 payments
  10. ADCETRIS $188 5 payments
  11. Other $5,519 265 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 41 drugs

Part D claims

1,300

Median for Hematology-Oncology: 604

Drug cost

$4,023,356

Median for Hematology-Oncology: $1,306,514

Branded share of claims

29.2%

Median for Hematology-Oncology: 31.6%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Brukinsa Zanubrutinib Brand 60 $874,046
Imbruvica Ibrutinib Brand 51 $820,918
Revlimid Lenalidomide Brand 41 $755,174
Jakafi Ruxolitinib Phosphate Brand 21 $401,771
Cabometyx Cabozantinib S-Malate Brand 12 $304,922
Jaypirca Pirtobrutinib Brand 13 $261,493
Calquence Acalabrutinib Maleate Brand 23 $250,657
Sprycel Dasatinib Brand 12 $208,089
Venclexta Venetoclax Brand 38 $69,237
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 24 $32,270

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 41 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 8,746 Part D prescribers listed as Hematology-Oncology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 15 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$57,796

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

265

Average age 74

Services billed

789

163 women, 102 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Cancer 49%
Arthritis 46%
Diabetes 34%
Chronic kidney disease 29%
Ischemic heart disease 23%
Atrial fibrillation 23%
COPD 23%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 50 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
ENHERTU
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $2,461
  • Daiichi Sankyo Inc. $50
$2,511 — —
FOTIVDA
  • Aveo Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $95
$95 — —
OPDIVO
  • E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $88
$88 — —
DARZALEX
  • Janssen Biotech, Inc. $64
  • Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC $6
$70 — —
KEYTRUDA
  • Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $68
$68 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 50 with Patron

Records

246 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Hematology & Oncology in Idaho

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record