Product Program year 2025 Source: CMS Open Payments

Darzalex

Biological Oncology

NDC 57894-502-05

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$12,217,911

96,964 payments

Research payments

$23,457,271

1,036 payments

Through program year 2025, $12,217,911 in general payments and $23,457,271 in research payments were reported against Darzalex (Oncology).

No combined total These are different kinds of money, reported under different rules. A meal and a clinical trial grant do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

By program year

14 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2025 General $1,175,320 17,021
2025 Research $4,606,942 135
2024 General $3,103,306 18,293
2024 Research $4,841,367 248
2023 General $1,927,741 15,330
2023 Research $4,153,765 160
2022 General $1,972,849 13,965
2022 Research $2,457,749 128
2021 General $1,359,430 11,565
2021 Research $2,823,436 172
2020 General $675,813 6,007
2020 Research $2,274,511 112
2019 General $2,003,451 14,783
2019 Research $2,299,502 81

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $10,979,064 91,057 payments
  2. Janssen Global Services, LLC $643,894 483 payments
  3. Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC $315,988 2,051 payments
  4. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc $241,950 3,296 payments
  5. Johnson & Johnson Health Care Systems Inc. $36,174 71 payments
  6. Janssen Research & Development, LLC $842 6 payments
Top recipients General payments · program year 2025
  1. Cleveland Clinic Hospital Teaching hospital · OH $50,000 4% · 1 payment
  2. Univ Of Mi Hospitals & Hlth Ctrs Teaching hospital · MI $45,000 4% · 2 payments
  3. Moffitt Cancer Center Teaching hospital · FL $40,000 3% · 5 payments
  4. University Of Alabama Hospital Teaching hospital · AL $20,000 2% · 2 payments
  5. Surbhi Sidana Hematology · Stanford, CA $18,882 2% · 30 payments

The top 5 of the 100 largest recipients; each share is of general payments naming this product in 2025.

The top 25 recipients, free in the app

Specialties paid General payments · program year 2025
  1. Hematology & Oncology Internal Medicine $356,361 39% · 2,090 practitioners
  2. Hematology Internal Medicine $108,309 12% · 95 practitioners
  3. Medical Oncology Internal Medicine $96,644 10% · 528 practitioners
  4. Nurse Practitioner $80,867 9% · 761 practitioners
  5. Nurse Practitioner, Family Nurse Practitioner $78,707 9% · 1,135 practitioners

The top 5 of 114 specialties; each share is of general payments naming this product to practitioners with a specialty in 2025. Each practitioner is counted under their primary specialty.

The top 25 specialties, free in the app

Where the money went General payments · program year 2025
  1. Florida $162,083 14% · 986 recipients
  2. California $104,519 9% · 671 recipients
  3. Ohio $96,446 8% · 195 recipients
  4. New York $93,405 8% · 391 recipients
  5. Texas $88,523 8% · 602 recipients

The top 5 of 53 states; each share is of general payments naming this product in 2025 where a state was reported.

The top 25 states, free in the app

Prescribed to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024

Part D claims

7,640

Prescriptions dispensed, refills included

Drug cost

$96,049,374

Paid at the pharmacy, in all

Medicare Part D drugs matched to DARZALEX, 2024
Part D drug Name match Relative to the largest Prescribers Claims Drug cost
Darzalex Faspro Daratumumab-Hyaluronidase-Fihj Similar name 218 6,205 $81,858,465
Darzalex Daratumumab Same name 45 1,435 $14,190,909

Matched to this product by name; CMS does not link its files to Open Payments, so a similar name can be a different strength, form or brand. Prescriber counts include only prescribers with 11 or more claims of the drug, because CMS publishes nothing below that. Part D covers drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries at a pharmacy; it does not include drugs given in a clinic or hospital, or patients with other insurance.

Largest prescribers

First 5 of 139 by claims · 2024

Two separate records. Claims come from Medicare and related payments from Open Payments. They are shown in one row because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

The prescribers with the most Part D claims of this drug in 2024
Prescriber Specialty State Claims Drug cost Related payments
Kamal Patel Hematology-Oncology AR 245 $2,158,391 None on record
Kirtan Koticha Hematology-Oncology LA 178 $2,886,783 $78
Sanaullah Khalid Hematology-Oncology OH 141 $1,344,953 $11
Manish Dhawan Hematology-Oncology LA 118 $1,156,806 $45
James Berenson Hematology-Oncology CA 99 $1,414,772 $11,143

"No profile" means the prescriber has no Open Payments record here; "None on record" means no payment naming this product in the payment year. Related payments are general payments, and one that names several products is split evenly, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it. The list is the prescribers with the most claims, up to 100 per drug.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 139 with Patron
96,964 general · 1,036 research

Every payment, record by record

Date, amount, who was paid and what for — filter by year and kind, or download as CSV, free, in files of 5,000 rows.

What you are looking at

Manufacturers name the drug, biological or device a payment relates to. CMS does not give products their own identifiers, so a product here is assembled from how it was reported — a brand may appear under more than one spelling, and this page covers one of them rather than the brand as a whole.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record