Product Program year 2025 Source: CMS Open Payments

Tecentriq

Biological BioOncology

NDC 50242-917-01

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$321,817,535

44,717 payments

Research payments

$482,467,210

33,469 payments

Through program year 2025, $321,817,535 in general payments and $482,467,210 in research payments were reported against Tecentriq (BioOncology).

No combined total These are different kinds of money, reported under different rules. A meal and a clinical trial grant do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

By program year

14 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2025 General $43,179,268 3,776
2025 Research $27,652,905 2,125
2024 General $50,096,950 5,690
2024 Research $44,295,636 3,492
2023 General $49,222,937 6,714
2023 Research $56,171,461 3,465
2022 General $43,693,964 4,909
2022 Research $73,514,980 4,627
2021 General $56,555,455 3,074
2021 Research $81,635,652 5,833
2020 General $44,814,305 2,578
2020 Research $84,800,927 6,264
2019 General $34,254,655 17,976
2019 Research $114,395,650 7,663

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Genentech, Inc. $313,751,925 1,050 payments
  2. Genentech USA, Inc. $6,107,910 42,404 payments
  3. F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG $1,637,799 1,068 payments
  4. Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. $185,575 68 payments
  5. Hoffmann-La Roche Limited $71,253 39 payments
  6. Roche Products Limited $63,073 88 payments
Top recipients General payments · program year 2025
  1. Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Teaching hospital · MA $42,790,022 99% · 5 payments
  2. Richard Finn Hematology & Oncology · Santa Monica, CA $24,915 <1% · 10 payments
  3. Stephen Liu Medical Oncology · Los Angeles, CA $22,737 <1% · 14 payments
  4. Mark Socinski Hematology & Oncology · Orlando, FL $22,470 <1% · 17 payments
  5. Kathleen Kerrigan Hematology & Oncology · Columbus, OH $20,343 <1% · 28 payments

The top 5 of the 100 largest recipients; each share is of general payments naming this product in 2025.

The top 25 recipients, free in the app

Specialties paid General payments · program year 2025
  1. Hematology & Oncology Internal Medicine $165,784 52% · 833 practitioners
  2. Medical Oncology Internal Medicine $84,664 27% · 264 practitioners
  3. Internal Medicine $13,935 4% · 89 practitioners
  4. Nurse Practitioner, Family Nurse Practitioner $13,186 4% · 435 practitioners
  5. Nurse Practitioner $7,701 2% · 233 practitioners

The top 5 of 77 specialties; each share is of general payments naming this product to practitioners with a specialty in 2025. Each practitioner is counted under their primary specialty.

The top 25 specialties, free in the app

Where the money went General payments · program year 2025
  1. Massachusetts $42,798,368 99% · 17 recipients
  2. California $84,499 <1% · 256 recipients
  3. Texas $42,436 <1% · 186 recipients
  4. North Carolina $28,904 <1% · 42 recipients
  5. Utah $28,513 <1% · 21 recipients

The top 5 of 51 states; each share is of general payments naming this product in 2025 where a state was reported.

The top 25 states, free in the app

Prescribed to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024

Part D claims

1,277

Prescriptions dispensed, refills included

Drug cost

$13,553,505

Paid at the pharmacy, in all

Prescribers

64

With 11 or more claims of it

Medicare Part D drugs matched to TECENTRIQ, 2024
Part D drug Name match Relative to the largest Prescribers Claims Drug cost
Tecentriq Atezolizumab Same name 64 1,277 $13,553,505

Matched to this product by name; CMS does not link its files to Open Payments, so a similar name can be a different strength, form or brand. Prescriber counts include only prescribers with 11 or more claims of the drug, because CMS publishes nothing below that. Part D covers drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries at a pharmacy; it does not include drugs given in a clinic or hospital, or patients with other insurance.

Largest prescribers

First 5 of 64 by claims · 2024

Two separate records. Claims come from Medicare and related payments from Open Payments. They are shown in one row because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

The prescribers with the most Part D claims of this drug in 2024
Prescriber Specialty State Claims Drug cost Related payments
Kamal Patel Hematology-Oncology AR 71 $757,867 None on record
Kirtan Koticha Hematology-Oncology LA 45 $473,311 $130
Manish Dhawan Hematology-Oncology LA 40 $418,811 $27
Syed Abid Medical Oncology FL 38 $394,289 None on record
John Graham Hematology-Oncology OH 37 $393,190 $25

"No profile" means the prescriber has no Open Payments record here; "None on record" means no payment naming this product in the payment year. Related payments are general payments, and one that names several products is split evenly, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it. The list is the prescribers with the most claims, up to 100 per drug.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 64 with Patron

Given in the clinic

Part B · billing code
Medicare Part B billing codes matched to TECENTRIQ
Billing code Providers Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, atezolizumab, 10 mg J9022 18 92,688 $6,157,047

Drugs given by a clinician are billed to Medicare Part B, not Part D. The product is tied to a billing code through the NDC on CMS's crosswalk, which was published for a later quarter than the payments, so a code that changed in between can be missed. Providers with fewer than 11 patients for the code are not published. Medicare's payment here is what it paid for the services, to the billing practice.

44,717 general · 33,469 research

Every payment, record by record

Date, amount, who was paid and what for — filter by year and kind, or download as CSV, free, in files of 5,000 rows.

What you are looking at

Manufacturers name the drug, biological or device a payment relates to. CMS does not give products their own identifiers, so a product here is assembled from how it was reported — a brand may appear under more than one spelling, and this page covers one of them rather than the brand as a whole.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record