Research study Program year 2025 Source: CMS Open Payments

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Phase 3 Study to Evalua

Research payments

$1,430,082

536 payments

Through program year 2025, $1,430,082 in research payments was reported against A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Phase 3 Study to Evalua, across 536 payments, paid by GlaxoSmithKline, LLC..

Paid by
GlaxoSmithKline, LLC.
ClinicalTrials.gov
No trial number was reported for this study

By program year

2 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2025 Research $863,038 386
2024 Research $567,045 150

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program years 2024–2025
  1. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $1,430,082 536 payments
Who received the money Research payments · program years 2024–2025
  1. Sarah Cannon Research Institute LLC Organisation paid for research $157,700 76 payments
  2. Exigent Research Organisation paid for research $107,805 25 payments
  3. Yale University Organisation paid for research $89,283 60 payments
  4. Oneoncology Organisation paid for research $75,867 24 payments
  5. Exigent Research LLC Organisation paid for research $67,173 18 payments
  6. Bon Secours Mercy Health Headquarters Organisation paid for research $67,118 44 payments
  7. State University Of Iowa Organisation paid for research $64,872 16 payments
  8. Nebraska Methodist Hospital Organisation paid for research $62,490 37 payments
  9. Oneoncology Research Network LLC Organisation paid for research $51,906 20 payments
  10. University of Cincinnati Organisation paid for research $51,268 10 payments

Usually the institution or organisation running the study, not a person.

Every payment, record by record

Date, amount, who was paid and what for — filter by year and kind, or download as CSV, free, in files of 5,000 rows.

Principal investigators named

10 shown

Named on the study's payments. Being named is not being paid: the money in the figures above went to the recipients listed, not necessarily to these people.

What you are looking at

Research payments are tied to a study. Being named on a study as a principal investigator is reported separately from being paid as a recipient, and the two are not the same thing — a named investigator has not necessarily received the money.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record