Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Barbara Burtness

Medical Oncology New Haven, CT Medical Doctor

NPI 1194715649 CMS profile 235726

333 Cedar St, New Haven, CT 06510

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$296,624

209 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$47,243

Paid to them · 9 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$2,804,979 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2019–2025

Through program year 2025, Barbara Burtness of New Haven, CT is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $296,624 across 209 general payments and $47,243 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $2,804,979 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 96th percentile of Medical Oncology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

10 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $51,893 35
2025 Research $54 1
2024 General $89,926 52
2024 Research $45,666 6
2023 General $39,357 36
2022 General $42,540 33
2022 Research $1,523 2
2021 General $33,067 14
2020 General $17,878 13
2019 General $21,964 26

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Barbara Burtness
  • Medical Oncology median
  • Middle half of Medical Oncology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Barbara Burtness were reported at $51,893. Among 3,316 Medical Oncology profiles paid that year, the median was $1,128 and the middle half received between $147 and $5,675.

Show as a table
Year Barbara Burtness Medical Oncology median Middle half National median
2019 $21,964 $968 $140–$6,658 $163
2020 $17,878 $747 $102–$5,891 $114
2021 $33,067 $430 $50–$4,098 $132
2022 $42,540 $812 $127–$4,907 $149
2023 $39,357 $957 $144–$5,248 $160
2024 $89,926 $1,042 $149–$5,650 $164
2025 $51,893 $1,128 $147–$5,675 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $137,799 91 payments
  2. AstraZeneca UK Limited $24,845 12 payments
  3. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $21,170 30 payments
  4. EMD Serono, Inc. $12,922 4 payments
  5. AbbVie, Inc. $11,688 9 payments
  6. Genmab U.S., Inc. $11,582 12 payments
  7. Merck KGaA $8,288 7 payments
  8. Genentech, Inc. $6,700 3 payments
  9. Janssen Research & Development, LLC $6,615 3 payments
  10. Merck Healthcare KGaA $6,583 6 payments
  11. Other $48,432 32 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Consulting Fee $193,542 72 payments
  2. Travel and Lodging $64,719 70 payments
  3. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $29,390 9 payments
  4. Honoraria $6,400 2 payments
  5. Food and Beverage $2,573 56 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. KEYTRUDA $45,696 52 payments
  2. Lenvima $6,550 3 payments
  3. TIVDAK $6,421 10 payments
  4. RYBREVANT $3,411 5 payments
  5. PADCEV $2,700 1 payment
  6. CABOMETYX $1,980 1 payment
  7. LOQTORZI $1,950 1 payment
  8. ZUSDURI $690 1 payment

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Research payments came from Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $41,182 3 payments
  2. Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. $4,275 1 payment
  3. EMD Serono, Inc. $1,523 2 payments
  4. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $263 3 payments

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 3 drugs

Part D claims

44

Median for Medical Oncology: 414

Drug cost

$623

Median for Medical Oncology: $849,427

Branded share of claims

25%

Median for Medical Oncology: 28.5%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Gabapentin Generic 15 $524
Levothyroxine Sodium Generic 18 $56
Sodium Fluoride Fluoride (Sodium) Brand 11 $43

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 3,431 Part D prescribers listed as Medical Oncology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 13 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$14,181

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

52

Average age 72

Services billed

226

12 women, 40 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 46%
COPD 40%
Diabetes 37%
Ischemic heart disease 37%
Heart failure 31%
Cancer 25%
Atrial fibrillation 23%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

4 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
KEYTRUDA
  • Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $12,788
$12,788 — —
TIVDAK
  • Genmab U.S., Inc. $6,158
$6,158 — —
PADCEV
  • Astellas Pharma Global Development $2,700
$2,700 — —
LOQTORZI
  • Coherus Biosciences Inc. $1,950
$1,950 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

Records

218 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record