Product Program year 2025 Source: CMS Open Payments

Padcev

Drug Oncology

NDC 51144-020-01

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$2,994,578

21,773 payments

Research payments

$47,406,789

3,639 payments

Through program year 2025, $2,994,578 in general payments and $47,406,789 in research payments were reported against Padcev (Oncology).

No combined total These are different kinds of money, reported under different rules. A meal and a clinical trial grant do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

By program year

14 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2025 General $960,888 3,669
2025 Research $12,947,963 1,058
2024 General $828,998 4,546
2024 Research $9,268,704 724
2023 General $498,899 4,708
2023 Research $8,597,784 360
2022 General $352,359 3,746
2022 Research $9,709,700 518
2021 General $194,724 3,103
2021 Research $3,854,129 532
2020 General $157,980 1,952
2020 Research $2,926,909 434
2019 General $730 49
2019 Research $101,600 13

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Astellas Pharma US Inc $2,265,251 21,202 payments
  2. Astellas Pharma Global Development $395,672 453 payments
  3. Astellas Pharma Europe Ltd $313,089 108 payments
  4. Astellas Pharma Inc $20,567 10 payments
Top recipients General payments · program year 2025
  1. Joaquin Bellmunt Molins Medical Oncology · Boston, MA $45,737 5% · 7 payments
  2. Amit Mehta Hematology & Oncology · Cary, NC $37,583 4% · 25 payments
  3. Zhentao Zhang Hematology & Oncology · Fort Wayne, IN $29,988 3% · 17 payments
  4. Marc Matrana Hematology & Oncology · New Orleans, LA $29,959 3% · 17 payments
  5. Vadim Koshkin Internal Medicine · Cleveland, OH $27,794 3% · 18 payments

The top 5 of the 100 largest recipients; each share is of general payments naming this product in 2025.

The top 25 recipients, free in the app

Specialties paid General payments · program year 2025
  1. Hematology & Oncology Internal Medicine $373,888 40% · 745 practitioners
  2. Medical Oncology Internal Medicine $234,873 25% · 234 practitioners
  3. Urology $111,956 12% · 231 practitioners
  4. Internal Medicine $82,736 9% · 45 practitioners
  5. Neurology Psychiatry & Neurology $27,816 3% · 2 practitioners

The top 5 of 54 specialties; each share is of general payments naming this product to practitioners with a specialty in 2025. Each practitioner is counted under their primary specialty.

The top 25 specialties, free in the app

Where the money went General payments · program year 2025
  1. California $166,004 17% · 233 recipients
  2. Texas $85,852 9% · 177 recipients
  3. Massachusetts $79,617 8% · 15 recipients
  4. Florida $64,030 7% · 318 recipients
  5. New York $54,569 6% · 113 recipients

The top 5 of 49 states; each share is of general payments naming this product in 2025 where a state was reported.

The top 25 states, free in the app

Prescribed to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024

Part D claims

181

Prescriptions dispensed, refills included

Drug cost

$4,310,820

Paid at the pharmacy, in all

Prescribers

9

With 11 or more claims of it

Medicare Part D drugs matched to PADCEV, 2024
Part D drug Name match Relative to the largest Prescribers Claims Drug cost
Padcev Enfortumab Vedotin-Ejfv Same name 9 181 $4,310,820

Matched to this product by name; CMS does not link its files to Open Payments, so a similar name can be a different strength, form or brand. Prescriber counts include only prescribers with 11 or more claims of the drug, because CMS publishes nothing below that. Part D covers drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries at a pharmacy; it does not include drugs given in a clinic or hospital, or patients with other insurance.

Largest prescribers

First 5 of 9 by claims · 2024

Two separate records. Claims come from Medicare and related payments from Open Payments. They are shown in one row because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

The prescribers with the most Part D claims of this drug in 2024
Prescriber Specialty State Claims Drug cost Related payments
Rohit Kapoor Hematology-Oncology TX 52 $1,700,487 $161
Raymond Elsoueidi Hematology-Oncology KY 37 $397,041 $32
Youram Nassir Hematology CA 15 $448,238 $82
Vaseem Akhtar Medical Oncology FL 14 $315,372 $14
Tina Khair Hematology-Oncology PA 14 $232,177 None on record

"No profile" means the prescriber has no Open Payments record here; "None on record" means no payment naming this product in the payment year. Related payments are general payments, and one that names several products is split evenly, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it. The list is the prescribers with the most claims, up to 100 per drug.

See all 9 in the dashboard with a free account

Given in the clinic

Part B · billing code
Medicare Part B billing codes matched to PADCEV
Billing code Providers Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, enfortumab vedotin-ejfv, 0.25 mg J9177 19 266,304 $7,605,782

Drugs given by a clinician are billed to Medicare Part B, not Part D. The product is tied to a billing code through the NDC on CMS's crosswalk, which was published for a later quarter than the payments, so a code that changed in between can be missed. Providers with fewer than 11 patients for the code are not published. Medicare's payment here is what it paid for the services, to the billing practice.

21,773 general · 3,639 research

Every payment, record by record

Date, amount, who was paid and what for — filter by year and kind, or download as CSV, free, in files of 5,000 rows.

What you are looking at

Manufacturers name the drug, biological or device a payment relates to. CMS does not give products their own identifiers, so a product here is assembled from how it was reported — a brand may appear under more than one spelling, and this page covers one of them rather than the brand as a whole.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record