Organisation paid for research Program year 2025 Source: CMS Open Payments

Exigent Research LLC

Neither a doctor nor a teaching hospital

Research payments

$4,586,988

785 payments

Through program year 2025, Exigent Research LLC is reported as receiving $4,586,988 in research payments, across 785 payments.

By program year

3 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2025 Research $3,303,351 466
2024 Research $1,125,208 297
2023 Research $158,429 22

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program years 2023–2025
  1. Janssen Research & Development, LLC $1,106,429 102 payments
  2. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $731,672 14 payments
  3. AbbVie, Inc. $681,886 321 payments
  4. Mirati Therapeutics, Inc. $339,563 34 payments
  5. Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $330,473 72 payments
  6. Pfizer Inc. $273,689 30 payments
  7. Day One Biopharmaceuticals $190,473 77 payments
  8. Celgene Corporation $161,833 5 payments
  9. Aadi Bioscience, Inc. $154,123 22 payments
  10. Genentech, Inc. $144,163 46 payments
Studies the money was for Research payments · program years 2023–2025
  1. A Phase IIIb Study to Characterize the Effectiveness and Safety of Adjuvant Ribociclib in a Wide Patient Population With HR+ HER2- Early Breast Cancer (Adjuvant WIDER) $731,672 14 payments
  2. Study to Evaluate Adverse Events Change in Disease Activity and How ABBV-706 Moves Through the Body When Intravenously (IV) Infused Alone or in Combination With IV Infused Budigalimab Cisplatin or Carboplatin in Adult Participants With Advanced Solid Tumors $383,601 243 payments
  3. A Phase 3 Study of Fixed Dose Combinations of Fianlimab and Cemiplimab Versus Relatlimab and Nivolumab in Participants With Unresectable or Metastatic Melanoma $330,473 72 payments
  4. A Phase 2b, Open-Label, Two-cohort Study of Subcutaneous Amivantamab in Combination with Lazertinib as First-Line Treatment, or Subcutaneous Amivantamab in Combination with Platinum-Based Chemotherapy as Second-line Treatment, for Common EGFR-Mutated Loc $224,501 16 payments
  5. A Phase 3 Randomized Study Comparing Teclistamab in Combination with Daratumumab SC and Lenalidomide (Tec-DR) versus Daratumumab SC, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone (DRd) in Participants with Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Who are Either Ineligible or not Intended for Autologous Stem Cell Transplant as Initial Therapy. $212,612 16 payments
  6. A Phase 3 Randomized Study Comparing Teclistamab Monotherapy versus Pomalidomide, Bortezomib, Dexamethasone (PVd) or Carfilzomib, Dexamethasone (Kd) in Participants with Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma who have Received 1 to 3 Prior Lines of Ther $200,864 25 payments
  7. A Phase 2 Trial of MRTX849 Monotherapy and in Combination With Pembrolizumab in Patients With Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer With KRAS G12C Mutation $195,605 19 payments
  8. A Phase 1b/2, Open Label Study of DAY101 Monotherapy or Combination with Other Therapies for Patients with Recurrent, Progressive, or Refractory Solid Tumors Harboring MAPK Pathway Aberrations $190,473 77 payments
  9. A Phase 2 Multi-center Open-label Basket Trial of Nab-sirolimus for Adult and Adolescent Patients With Malignant Solid Tumors Harboring Pathogenic Inactivating Alterations in TSC1 or TSC2 Genes $154,123 22 payments
  10. A Phase 3 Randomized Study Comparing Teclistamab Monotherapy versus Pomalidomide, Bortezomib, Dexamethasone (PVd) or Carfilzomib, Dexamethasone (Kd) in Participants with Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma who have Received 1 to 3 Prior Lines of Therapy, Including an Anti-CD38 Monoclonal Antibody and Lenalidomide $144,674 12 payments
What the money was spent on Research payments · program years 2023–2025
  1. Non-patient care $62,682 12 payments
  2. Patient care $23,935 5 payments

Only reported on some payments, and a payment can report more than one category, so these amounts overlap.

What you are looking at

A noncovered recipient is an organisation paid for research that is neither an individual clinician nor a teaching hospital — typically a contract research organisation, a foundation or a trial site network. They receive 81% of all reported research money, which is why they appear here at all.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record