Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Rita Nanda

Hematology & Oncology Chicago, IL Medical Doctor

NPI 1568524015 CMS profile 863001

5841 S Maryland Ave, Chicago, IL 60637

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$286,463

222 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$3,193,658 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2019–2025

Through program year 2025, Rita Nanda of Chicago, IL is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $286,463 across 222 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $3,193,658 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 97th percentile of Hematology & Oncology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $38,168 41
2024 General $55,605 37
2023 General $75,023 51
2022 General $25,111 15
2021 General $18,220 10
2020 General $15,545 10
2019 General $58,791 58

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Rita Nanda
  • Hematology & Oncology median
  • Middle half of Hematology & Oncology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Rita Nanda were reported at $38,168. Among 8,769 Hematology & Oncology profiles paid that year, the median was $683 and the middle half received between $143 and $3,154.

Show as a table
Year Rita Nanda Hematology & Oncology median Middle half National median
2019 $58,791 $529 $121–$2,516 $163
2020 $15,545 $339 $82–$2,213 $114
2021 $18,220 $263 $49–$1,965 $132
2022 $25,111 $416 $103–$2,395 $149
2023 $75,023 $542 $125–$2,646 $160
2024 $55,605 $692 $141–$3,008 $164
2025 $38,168 $683 $143–$3,154 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Gilead Sciences, Inc. $66,795 52 payments
  2. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $59,276 29 payments
  3. Genentech USA, Inc. $47,821 45 payments
  4. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $23,607 24 payments
  5. Pfizer Inc. $21,553 17 payments
  6. Daiichi Sankyo Inc. $19,062 15 payments
  7. Seattle Genetics, Inc. $11,035 11 payments
  8. Genzyme Corporation $8,563 3 payments
  9. Ge Healthcare $6,407 6 payments
  10. Immunomedics, Inc. $5,150 3 payments
  11. Other $17,195 17 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Consulting Fee $149,653 68 payments
  2. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $84,231 17 payments
  3. Travel and Lodging $46,045 62 payments
  4. Food and Beverage $5,667 72 payments
  5. Compensation for serving as faculty or as a speaker for a medical education program $843 1 payment
  6. Education $24 2 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Trodelvy Onc $42,775 22 payments
  2. TECENTRIQ $33,340 30 payments
  3. Herceptin $27,755 21 payments
  4. TUKYSA $16,289 15 payments
  5. ENHERTU $13,777 10 payments
  6. IBRANCE $11,876 9 payments
  7. Perjeta $7,659 11 payments
  8. TRODELVY Oncology $5,150 3 payments
  9. LYNPARZA $3,425 3 payments
  10. VERZENIO $2,700 2 payments
  11. Other $8,967 17 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 6 drugs

Part D claims

129

Median for Hematology-Oncology: 604

Drug cost

$869,746

Median for Hematology-Oncology: $1,306,514

Branded share of claims

41.1%

Median for Hematology-Oncology: 31.6%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Ibrance Palbociclib Brand 28 $454,216
Kisqali Ribociclib Succinate Brand 25 $410,637
Exemestane Generic 26 $4,098
Anastrozole Generic 23 $391
Letrozole Generic 15 $258
Gabapentin Generic 12 $146

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 8,746 Part D prescribers listed as Hematology-Oncology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 14 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$19,518

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

94

Average age 71

Services billed

234

73 women, 21 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
Cancer 73%
High blood pressure 64%
Arthritis 38%
Diabetes 24%
Chronic kidney disease 24%
Heart failure 22%
Ischemic heart disease 21%
Osteoporosis 20%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 6 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
Trodelvy
  • Gilead Sciences, Inc. $18,037
$18,037 — —
ENHERTU
  • Daiichi Sankyo Inc. $13,033
$13,033 — —
TUKYSA
  • PFIZER INC. $6,794
$6,794 — —
IBRANCE
  • PFIZER INC. $6,375
$6,375 28 —
VERZENIO
  • Eli Lilly and Company $2,700
$2,700 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 6 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

222 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Hematology & Oncology in Illinois

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record