Product Program year 2025 Source: CMS Open Payments

Perjeta

Biological BioOncology

NDC 50242-145-01

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$55,614,868

11,401 payments

Research payments

$29,262,667

3,977 payments

Through program year 2025, $55,614,868 in general payments and $29,262,667 in research payments were reported against Perjeta (BioOncology).

No combined total These are different kinds of money, reported under different rules. A meal and a clinical trial grant do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

By program year

14 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2025 General $117,245 142
2025 Research $2,707,460 121
2024 General $74,406 1,371
2024 Research $2,232,368 429
2023 General $149,542 1,832
2023 Research $2,161,040 250
2022 General $123,214 1,437
2022 Research $4,434,910 582
2021 General $108,255 345
2021 Research $5,536,975 752
2020 General $29,733,998 791
2020 Research $7,321,866 1,177
2019 General $25,308,208 5,483
2019 Research $4,868,048 666

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Genentech, Inc. $54,506,875 66 payments
  2. Genentech USA, Inc. $892,731 11,205 payments
  3. F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG $185,688 114 payments
  4. Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. $27,385 10 payments
  5. Hoffmann-La Roche Limited $1,320 1 payment
  6. Roche Products Limited $870 5 payments
Top recipients General payments · program year 2025
  1. Sara Tolaney Hematology & Oncology · Boston, MA $25,920 22% · 9 payments
  2. Joyce O'Shaughnessy Medical Oncology · Dallas, TX $7,918 7% · 6 payments
  3. Kazuaki Takabe Surgery · Buffalo, NY $5,966 5% · 3 payments
  4. Yuan Yuan Medical Oncology · Pasadena, CA $5,709 5% · 3 payments
  5. Shanu Modi Medical Oncology · New York, NY $4,292 4% · 4 payments

The top 5 of 82 recipients; each share is of general payments naming this product in 2025.

The top 25 recipients, free in the app

Specialties paid General payments · program year 2025
  1. Medical Oncology Internal Medicine $56,908 50% · 21 practitioners
  2. Hematology & Oncology Internal Medicine $45,299 39% · 22 practitioners
  3. Surgery $5,966 5% · 1 practitioner
  4. Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism Internal Medicine $2,014 2% · 1 practitioner
  5. Nurse Practitioner, Family Nurse Practitioner $1,092 <1% · 9 practitioners

The top 5 of 17 specialties; each share is of general payments naming this product to practitioners with a specialty in 2025. Each practitioner is counted under their primary specialty.

The top 25 specialties, free in the app

Where the money went General payments · program year 2025
  1. Massachusetts $36,667 31% · 5 recipients
  2. New York $25,109 21% · 8 recipients
  3. Illinois $10,396 9% · 3 recipients
  4. California $9,195 8% · 5 recipients
  5. Texas $8,812 8% · 4 recipients

The top 5 of 21 states; each share is of general payments naming this product in 2025 where a state was reported.

The top 25 states, free in the app

Prescribed to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024

Part D claims

918

Prescriptions dispensed, refills included

Drug cost

$6,258,852

Paid at the pharmacy, in all

Prescribers

55

With 11 or more claims of it

Medicare Part D drugs matched to Perjeta, 2024
Part D drug Name match Relative to the largest Prescribers Claims Drug cost
Perjeta Pertuzumab Same name 55 918 $6,258,852

Matched to this product by name; CMS does not link its files to Open Payments, so a similar name can be a different strength, form or brand. Prescriber counts include only prescribers with 11 or more claims of the drug, because CMS publishes nothing below that. Part D covers drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries at a pharmacy; it does not include drugs given in a clinic or hospital, or patients with other insurance.

Largest prescribers

First 5 of 55 by claims · 2024

Two separate records. Claims come from Medicare and related payments from Open Payments. They are shown in one row because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

The prescribers with the most Part D claims of this drug in 2024
Prescriber Specialty State Claims Drug cost Related payments
Javier Ruiz Hematology-Oncology NY 30 $216,033 None on record
Yelda Nouri Hematology-Oncology NY 29 $221,758 None on record
Zili He Hematology-Oncology NY 28 $194,320 None on record
Noshir Dacosta Medical Oncology NY 28 $185,331 None on record
Ahmed Ali Hematology-Oncology DC 27 $199,515 None on record

"No profile" means the prescriber has no Open Payments record here; "None on record" means no payment naming this product in the payment year. Related payments are general payments, and one that names several products is split evenly, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it. The list is the prescribers with the most claims, up to 100 per drug.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 55 with Patron

Given in the clinic

Part B · billing code
Medicare Part B billing codes matched to Perjeta
Billing code Providers Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, pertuzumab, 1 mg J9306 3 83,142 $1,019,134

Drugs given by a clinician are billed to Medicare Part B, not Part D. The product is tied to a billing code through the NDC on CMS's crosswalk, which was published for a later quarter than the payments, so a code that changed in between can be missed. Providers with fewer than 11 patients for the code are not published. Medicare's payment here is what it paid for the services, to the billing practice.

11,401 general · 3,977 research

Every payment, record by record

Date, amount, who was paid and what for — filter by year and kind, or download as CSV, free, in files of 5,000 rows.

What you are looking at

Manufacturers name the drug, biological or device a payment relates to. CMS does not give products their own identifiers, so a product here is assembled from how it was reported — a brand may appear under more than one spelling, and this page covers one of them rather than the brand as a whole.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record