Product Program year 2025 Source: CMS Open Payments

Ibrance

Drug Oncology

NDC 0069-0187-21

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$5,366,826

64,541 payments

Research payments

$493,456,343

19,942 payments

Through program year 2025, $5,366,826 in general payments and $493,456,343 in research payments were reported against Ibrance (Oncology).

No combined total These are different kinds of money, reported under different rules. A meal and a clinical trial grant do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

By program year

14 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2025 General $924,629 11,945
2025 Research $17,520,893 1,547
2024 General $1,013,650 13,680
2024 Research $27,893,460 1,999
2023 General $823,430 9,488
2023 Research $33,577,744 1,878
2022 General $665,763 7,282
2022 Research $67,486,343 1,940
2021 General $517,550 5,640
2021 Research $76,804,924 2,606
2020 General $568,274 3,713
2020 Research $192,736,809 4,964
2019 General $853,531 12,793
2019 Research $77,436,170 5,008

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Pfizer Inc. $5,222,416 61,916 payments
  2. Pfizer International LLC $81,561 40 payments
  3. PBG Puerto Rico LLC $44,427 2,161 payments
  4. Whitehall International Inc $7,165 2 payments
  5. Array BioPharma Inc. $4,953 285 payments
  6. Pfizer Pharmaceuticals LLC $2,323 130 payments
  7. Pfizer S.A. $2,200 1 payment
  8. Pfizer Zona Franca, S.A. $861 2 payments
  9. Pfizer Pharma GMBH $499 1 payment
  10. Pfizer Corporation Hong Kong Limited $359 2 payments
Top recipients General payments · program year 2025
  1. Anne Odea Medical Oncology · Westwood, KS $104,373 11% · 56 payments
  2. Adam Brufsky Pittsburgh, PA $39,416 4% · 16 payments
  3. Vandana Abramson Medical Oncology · Nashville, TN $35,532 4% · 19 payments
  4. Sramila Aithal Medical Oncology · Bensalem, PA $33,803 4% · 16 payments
  5. Priya Rudolph Hematology & Oncology · Athens, GA $33,256 4% · 18 payments

The top 5 of the 100 largest recipients; each share is of general payments naming this product in 2025.

The top 25 recipients, free in the app

Specialties paid General payments · program year 2025
  1. Hematology & Oncology Internal Medicine $316,223 37% · 2,122 practitioners
  2. Medical Oncology Internal Medicine $309,316 37% · 597 practitioners
  3. Nurse Practitioner, Family Nurse Practitioner $86,413 10% · 710 practitioners
  4. Nurse Practitioner, Adult Health Nurse Practitioner $33,182 4% · 141 practitioners
  5. Nurse Practitioner $32,616 4% · 449 practitioners

The top 5 of 69 specialties; each share is of general payments naming this product to practitioners with a specialty in 2025. Each practitioner is counted under their primary specialty.

The top 25 specialties, free in the app

Where the money went General payments · program year 2025
  1. California $114,544 12% · 470 recipients
  2. Kansas $111,883 12% · 59 recipients
  3. Pennsylvania $109,186 12% · 112 recipients
  4. Florida $80,163 9% · 662 recipients
  5. Tennessee $70,353 8% · 226 recipients

The top 5 of 50 states; each share is of general payments naming this product in 2025 where a state was reported.

The top 25 states, free in the app

Prescribed to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024

Part D claims

111,354

Prescriptions dispensed, refills included

Drug cost

$1,720,573,795

Paid at the pharmacy, in all

Prescribers

4,236

With 11 or more claims of it

Medicare Part D drugs matched to IBRANCE, 2024
Part D drug Name match Relative to the largest Prescribers Claims Drug cost
Ibrance Palbociclib Same name 4,236 111,354 $1,720,573,795

Matched to this product by name; CMS does not link its files to Open Payments, so a similar name can be a different strength, form or brand. Prescriber counts include only prescribers with 11 or more claims of the drug, because CMS publishes nothing below that. Part D covers drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries at a pharmacy; it does not include drugs given in a clinic or hospital, or patients with other insurance.

Largest prescribers

First 5 of 100 by claims · 2024

Two separate records. Claims come from Medicare and related payments from Open Payments. They are shown in one row because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

The prescribers with the most Part D claims of this drug in 2024
Prescriber Specialty State Claims Drug cost Related payments
Luis Baez Vallecillo Hematology-Oncology PR 225 $3,602,269 $143
Nguyet Le-Lindqwister Hematology-Oncology IL 205 $2,941,846 None on record
Amy Vander Woude Hematology-Oncology MI 172 $2,621,395 None on record
Monica Mendez Hematology-Oncology PR 160 $2,551,099 $112
Christina Bi Pharmacist CA 160 $2,469,769 No profile

"No profile" means the prescriber has no Open Payments record here; "None on record" means no payment naming this product in the payment year. Related payments are general payments, and one that names several products is split evenly, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it. The list is the prescribers with the most claims, up to 100 per drug.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 100 with Patron
64,541 general · 19,942 research

Every payment, record by record

Date, amount, who was paid and what for — filter by year and kind, or download as CSV, free, in files of 5,000 rows.

What you are looking at

Manufacturers name the drug, biological or device a payment relates to. CMS does not give products their own identifiers, so a product here is assembled from how it was reported — a brand may appear under more than one spelling, and this page covers one of them rather than the brand as a whole.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record