Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Matthew Galsky

Medical Oncology New York, NY Medical Doctor

NPI 1639140668 CMS profile 28374

10 E 102Nd St, New York, NY 10029

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$214,437

184 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$32,893

Paid to them · 33 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$27,865,591 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2019–2025

Through program year 2025, Matthew Galsky of New York, NY is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $214,437 across 184 general payments and $32,893 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $27,865,591 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 94th percentile of Medical Oncology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

12 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $1,254 7
2025 Research $20,956 21
2024 General $2,990 15
2024 Research $5,080 3
2023 General $39,629 31
2023 Research $4,007 3
2022 General $26,138 23
2021 General $68,869 35
2021 Research $2,347 5
2020 General $32,665 25
2020 Research $503 1
2019 General $42,892 48

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Matthew Galsky
  • Medical Oncology median
  • Middle half of Medical Oncology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Matthew Galsky were reported at $1,254. Among 3,316 Medical Oncology profiles paid that year, the median was $1,128 and the middle half received between $147 and $5,675.

Show as a table
Year Matthew Galsky Medical Oncology median Middle half National median
2019 $42,892 $968 $140–$6,658 $163
2020 $32,665 $747 $102–$5,891 $114
2021 $68,869 $430 $50–$4,098 $132
2022 $26,138 $812 $127–$4,907 $149
2023 $39,629 $957 $144–$5,248 $160
2024 $2,990 $1,042 $149–$5,650 $164
2025 $1,254 $1,128 $147–$5,675 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Seattle Genetics, Inc. $35,823 35 payments
  2. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $28,828 27 payments
  3. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $27,959 19 payments
  4. Janssen Global Services, LLC $20,434 13 payments
  5. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $17,400 18 payments
  6. AbbVie, Inc. $14,849 9 payments
  7. Pfizer Inc. $14,839 12 payments
  8. Gilead Sciences, Inc. $13,065 12 payments
  9. F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG $8,528 8 payments
  10. Astellas Pharma Global Development $6,820 3 payments
  11. Other $25,891 28 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Consulting Fee $173,199 88 payments
  2. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $22,334 14 payments
  3. Travel and Lodging $12,053 23 payments
  4. Food and Beverage $4,578 56 payments
  5. Honoraria $2,250 1 payment
  6. Education $22 2 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. PADCEV Oncology $24,013 16 payments
  2. TECENTRIQ $15,070 11 payments
  3. KEYTRUDA $12,310 17 payments
  4. BAVENCIO $10,547 5 payments
  5. OPDIVO $9,588 3 payments
  6. Trodelvy $7,702 5 payments
  7. IMFINZI Cardiovascular And Metabolism $7,675 2 payments
  8. PADCEV Oncology $6,820 3 payments
  9. BALVERSA $5,823 6 payments
  10. IMFINZI Oncology $3,577 4 payments
  11. Other $4,637 26 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Research payments came from Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Pfizer Inc. $29,160 25 payments
  2. F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG $3,733 8 payments

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 1 drug

Part D claims

12

Median for Medical Oncology: 414

Drug cost

$56

Median for Medical Oncology: $849,427

Branded share of claims

0%

Median for Medical Oncology: 28.5%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Prednisone Generic 12 $56

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 3,431 Part D prescribers listed as Medical Oncology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 10 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$77,414

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

161

Average age 75

Services billed

790

41 women, 120 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
Cancer 75%
High blood pressure 71%
Ischemic heart disease 37%
Chronic kidney disease 36%
Diabetes 34%
Arthritis 34%
Heart failure 19%
COPD 19%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

3 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
KEYTRUDA
  • Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $760
$760 — —
Padcev
  • PFIZER INC. $110
$110 — —
Trodelvy
  • Gilead Sciences, Inc. $52
$52 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

Records

217 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Medical Oncology in New York

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record