Product Program year 2023 Source: CMS Open Payments

Padcev

Biological Oncology

NDC 51144-030-01

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$3,201,091

21,403 payments

Research payments

$76,157,392

7,560 payments

Through program year 2023, $3,201,091 in general payments and $76,157,392 in research payments were reported against Padcev (Oncology).

No combined total These are different kinds of money, reported under different rules. A meal and a clinical trial grant do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

By program year

10 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2023 General $1,066,614 7,398
2023 Research $14,638,792 2,057
2022 General $616,651 5,530
2022 Research $26,040,574 3,018
2021 General $997,655 5,564
2021 Research $23,546,567 1,689
2020 General $515,226 2,787
2020 Research $11,521,516 772
2019 General $4,945 124
2019 Research $409,943 24

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2023
  1. Seattle Genetics, Inc. $3,201,091 21,403 payments
Top recipients General payments · program year 2023
  1. Putao Cen Medical Oncology · Houston, TX $50,470 5% · 44 payments
  2. Scripps Mercy Hospital Teaching hospital · CA $50,000 5% · 2 payments
  3. Carl Henningson Hematology & Oncology · Manasquan, NJ $41,438 4% · 33 payments
  4. Daniel Landau Hematology & Oncology · Orlando, FL $35,244 3% · 25 payments
  5. Prateek Mendiratta Hematology & Oncology · Beachwood, OH $31,986 3% · 23 payments

The top 5 of the 100 largest recipients; each share is of general payments naming this product in 2023.

The top 25 recipients, free in the app

Specialties paid General payments · program year 2023
  1. Hematology & Oncology Internal Medicine $482,084 49% · 1,322 practitioners
  2. Medical Oncology Internal Medicine $337,448 34% · 413 practitioners
  3. Internal Medicine $56,449 6% · 73 practitioners
  4. Nurse Practitioner $31,036 3% · 410 practitioners
  5. Nurse Practitioner, Family Nurse Practitioner $24,081 2% · 565 practitioners

The top 5 of 74 specialties; each share is of general payments naming this product to practitioners with a specialty in 2023. Each practitioner is counted under their primary specialty.

The top 25 specialties, free in the app

Where the money went General payments · program year 2023
  1. Texas $153,356 14% · 262 recipients
  2. California $145,114 14% · 314 recipients
  3. Florida $80,063 8% · 529 recipients
  4. Illinois $72,372 7% · 175 recipients
  5. Ohio $61,142 6% · 133 recipients

The top 5 of 52 states; each share is of general payments naming this product in 2023 where a state was reported.

The top 25 states, free in the app

Prescribed to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024

Part D claims

181

Prescriptions dispensed, refills included

Drug cost

$4,310,820

Paid at the pharmacy, in all

Prescribers

9

With 11 or more claims of it

Medicare Part D drugs matched to PADCEV, 2024
Part D drug Name match Relative to the largest Prescribers Claims Drug cost
Padcev Enfortumab Vedotin-Ejfv Same name 9 181 $4,310,820

Matched to this product by name; CMS does not link its files to Open Payments, so a similar name can be a different strength, form or brand. Prescriber counts include only prescribers with 11 or more claims of the drug, because CMS publishes nothing below that. Part D covers drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries at a pharmacy; it does not include drugs given in a clinic or hospital, or patients with other insurance.

Largest prescribers

First 5 of 9 by claims · 2024

Two separate records. Claims come from Medicare and related payments from Open Payments. They are shown in one row because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

The prescribers with the most Part D claims of this drug in 2024
Prescriber Specialty State Claims Drug cost Related payments
Rohit Kapoor Hematology-Oncology TX 52 $1,700,487 $161
Raymond Elsoueidi Hematology-Oncology KY 37 $397,041 $32
Youram Nassir Hematology CA 15 $448,238 $82
Vaseem Akhtar Medical Oncology FL 14 $315,372 $14
Tina Khair Hematology-Oncology PA 14 $232,177 None on record

"No profile" means the prescriber has no Open Payments record here; "None on record" means no payment naming this product in the payment year. Related payments are general payments, and one that names several products is split evenly, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it. The list is the prescribers with the most claims, up to 100 per drug.

See all 9 in the dashboard with a free account

Given in the clinic

Part B · billing code
Medicare Part B billing codes matched to PADCEV
Billing code Providers Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, enfortumab vedotin-ejfv, 0.25 mg J9177 19 266,304 $7,605,782

Drugs given by a clinician are billed to Medicare Part B, not Part D. The product is tied to a billing code through the NDC on CMS's crosswalk, which was published for a later quarter than the payments, so a code that changed in between can be missed. Providers with fewer than 11 patients for the code are not published. Medicare's payment here is what it paid for the services, to the billing practice.

21,403 general · 7,560 research

Every payment, record by record

Date, amount, who was paid and what for — filter by year and kind, or download as CSV, free, in files of 5,000 rows.

What you are looking at

Manufacturers name the drug, biological or device a payment relates to. CMS does not give products their own identifiers, so a product here is assembled from how it was reported — a brand may appear under more than one spelling, and this page covers one of them rather than the brand as a whole.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2023

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record