Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

David Page

Medical Oncology Portland, OR Medical Doctor

NPI 1922241140 CMS profile 475427

4805 Ne Glisan St Ste 11N, Portland, OR 97213

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$237,865

275 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$3,777,966 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2019–2025

Through program year 2025, David Page of Portland, OR is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $237,865 across 275 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $3,777,966 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 94th percentile of Medical Oncology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $39,202 51
2024 General $25,945 46
2023 General $19,147 28
2022 General $47,622 51
2021 General $52,311 40
2020 General $8,354 8
2019 General $45,284 51

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • David Page
  • Medical Oncology median
  • Middle half of Medical Oncology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to David Page were reported at $39,202. Among 3,316 Medical Oncology profiles paid that year, the median was $1,128 and the middle half received between $147 and $5,675.

Show as a table
Year David Page Medical Oncology median Middle half National median
2019 $45,284 $968 $140–$6,658 $163
2020 $8,354 $747 $102–$5,891 $114
2021 $52,311 $430 $50–$4,098 $132
2022 $47,622 $812 $127–$4,907 $149
2023 $19,147 $957 $144–$5,248 $160
2024 $25,945 $1,042 $149–$5,650 $164
2025 $39,202 $1,128 $147–$5,675 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Genentech USA, Inc. $111,575 105 payments
  2. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $29,124 47 payments
  3. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $20,334 18 payments
  4. Lilly USA, LLC $17,083 5 payments
  5. Eli Lilly and Company $14,949 7 payments
  6. Gilead Sciences, Inc. $9,209 24 payments
  7. Seattle Genetics, Inc. $9,158 5 payments
  8. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $7,714 27 payments
  9. Stemline Therapeutics Inc. $7,633 11 payments
  10. Daiichi Sankyo Inc. $5,106 8 payments
  11. Other $5,980 18 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Consulting Fee $107,881 40 payments
  2. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $83,960 24 payments
  3. Travel and Lodging $34,951 76 payments
  4. Food and Beverage $9,174 113 payments
  5. Long term medical supply or device loan $1,696 18 payments
  6. Education $202 4 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Phesgo $62,472 57 payments
  2. Kadcyla $57,265 51 payments
  3. KISQALI $28,493 45 payments
  4. TECENTRIQ $24,188 25 payments
  5. Herceptin $17,739 16 payments
  6. Trodelvy $9,197 23 payments
  7. TUKYSA $9,120 6 payments
  8. Orserdu $7,633 11 payments
  9. VERZENIO $6,483 3 payments
  10. Perjeta $6,283 12 payments
  11. Other $11,819 41 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 13 drugs

Part D claims

625

Median for Medical Oncology: 414

Drug cost

$1,923,013

Median for Medical Oncology: $849,427

Branded share of claims

18.7%

Median for Medical Oncology: 28.5%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Ibrance Palbociclib Brand 38 $584,038
Lynparza Olaparib Brand 33 $536,003
Kisqali Ribociclib Succinate Brand 28 $437,805
Verzenio Abemaciclib Brand 18 $349,654
Exemestane Generic 56 $7,461
Anastrozole Generic 186 $3,417
Letrozole Generic 114 $2,474
Oxycodone Hcl Generic 19 $514
Tamoxifen Citrate Generic 25 $482
Alendronate Sodium Generic 53 $440

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 13 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 3,431 Part D prescribers listed as Medical Oncology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 9 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$23,499

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

115

Average age 71

Services billed

489

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
Cancer 75%
High blood pressure 56%
Arthritis 34%
Diabetes 21%
Depression 21%
Osteoporosis 21%
Chronic kidney disease 19%
Atrial fibrillation 16%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

5 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
Trodelvy
  • Gilead Sciences, Inc. $8,262
$8,262 — —
KISQALI
  • Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $4,112
$4,112 28 —
ENHERTU
  • Daiichi Sankyo Inc. $278
$278 — —
Orserdu
  • Stemline Therapeutics Inc. $63
$63 — —
TUKYSA
  • PFIZER INC. $47
$47 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

Records

275 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record