Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

David Chism

Medical Oncology Knoxville, TN Medical Doctor

NPI 1972805414 CMS profile 1159950

123 White Way, Knoxville, TN 37916

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$45,443

115 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$1,179,016 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2019–2025

Through program year 2025, David Chism of Knoxville, TN is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $45,443 across 115 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $1,179,016 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 81st percentile of Medical Oncology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $2,623 66
2024 General $6,442 6
2023 General $24,389 22
2022 General $7,203 14
2021 General $2,762 3
2020 General $1,992 2
2019 General $33 2

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • David Chism
  • Medical Oncology median
  • Middle half of Medical Oncology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to David Chism were reported at $2,623. Among 3,316 Medical Oncology profiles paid that year, the median was $1,128 and the middle half received between $147 and $5,675.

Show as a table
Year David Chism Medical Oncology median Middle half National median
2019 $33 $968 $140–$6,658 $163
2020 $1,992 $747 $102–$5,891 $114
2021 $2,762 $430 $50–$4,098 $132
2022 $7,203 $812 $127–$4,907 $149
2023 $24,389 $957 $144–$5,248 $160
2024 $6,442 $1,042 $149–$5,650 $164
2025 $2,623 $1,128 $147–$5,675 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $11,321 14 payments
  2. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $9,518 11 payments
  3. Exelixis Inc. $7,137 11 payments
  4. Pfizer Inc. $4,899 7 payments
  5. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $3,455 3 payments
  6. Genentech USA, Inc. $1,941 2 payments
  7. CTI BioPharma Corp. $1,725 1 payment
  8. Aveo Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $1,543 2 payments
  9. Seattle Genetics, Inc. $1,250 1 payment
  10. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $966 4 payments
  11. Other $1,688 59 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Consulting Fee $30,233 12 payments
  2. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $5,280 2 payments
  3. Travel and Lodging $3,503 12 payments
  4. Food and Beverage $3,119 82 payments
  5. Compensation for serving as faculty or as a speaker for a medical education program $1,725 1 payment
  6. Honoraria $1,500 1 payment
  7. Education $84 5 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. LIBTAYO $11,388 16 payments
  2. CABOMETYX $7,137 11 payments
  3. ORGOVYX $4,857 5 payments
  4. ENHERTU $2,398 1 payment
  5. TECENTRIQ $1,925 1 payment
  6. Vonjo $1,725 1 payment
  7. FOTIVDA $1,543 2 payments
  8. PADCEV $1,250 1 payment
  9. Xofigo $914 2 payments
  10. LYNPARZA $135 1 payment
  11. Other $2,191 82 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 40 drugs

Part D claims

1,128

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$2,488,540

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

27.9%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Xtandi Enzalutamide Brand 37 $534,610
Fotivda Tivozanib Hcl Brand 14 $427,927
Ojjaara Momelotinib Dihydrochloride Brand 12 $322,796
Pomalyst Pomalidomide Brand 13 $281,975
Ninlaro Ixazomib Citrate Brand 18 $229,020
Calquence Acalabrutinib Maleate Brand 16 $198,668
Verzenio Abemaciclib Brand 12 $180,021
Venclexta Venetoclax Brand 11 $168,051
Abiraterone Acetate Generic 29 $63,004
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 60 $40,055

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 40 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 21 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$63,849

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

250

Average age 73

Services billed

1,782

131 women, 119 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 59%
Cancer 55%
Ischemic heart disease 36%
Chronic kidney disease 36%
Diabetes 31%
COPD 30%
Depression 30%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

3 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
LYNPARZA
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $135
$135 — —
MONOFERRIC
  • Pharmacosmos Therapeutics Inc. $35
$35 — —
TAGRISSO
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $5
$5 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

Records

115 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Medical Oncology in Tennessee

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record