Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Bethany Sleckman

Medical Oncology Saint Louis, MO Medical Doctor

NPI 1861814386 CMS profile 84230

607 S New Ballas Rd, Suite 3425, Saint Louis, MO 63141

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$21,395

817 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$7,010

Paid to them · 7 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$2,412,977 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2019–2025

Through program year 2025, Bethany Sleckman of Saint Louis, MO is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $21,395 across 817 general payments and $7,010 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $2,412,977 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 76th percentile of Medical Oncology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

9 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $3,879 179
2024 General $3,280 147
2023 General $3,512 146
2022 General $2,136 102
2022 Research $4,470 3
2021 General $306 14
2021 Research $2,540 4
2020 General $536 38
2019 General $7,746 191

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Bethany Sleckman
  • Medical Oncology median
  • Middle half of Medical Oncology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Bethany Sleckman were reported at $3,879. Among 3,316 Medical Oncology profiles paid that year, the median was $1,128 and the middle half received between $147 and $5,675.

Show as a table
Year Bethany Sleckman Medical Oncology median Middle half National median
2019 $7,746 $968 $140–$6,658 $163
2020 $536 $747 $102–$5,891 $114
2021 $306 $430 $50–$4,098 $132
2022 $2,136 $812 $127–$4,907 $149
2023 $3,512 $957 $144–$5,248 $160
2024 $3,280 $1,042 $149–$5,650 $164
2025 $3,879 $1,128 $147–$5,675 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Pfizer Inc. $5,099 39 payments
  2. Daiichi Sankyo Inc. $1,675 76 payments
  3. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $1,384 84 payments
  4. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $1,256 57 payments
  5. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $1,053 45 payments
  6. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $761 37 payments
  7. Genentech USA, Inc. $743 25 payments
  8. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $730 37 payments
  9. Celgene Corporation $723 40 payments
  10. Seattle Genetics, Inc. $590 27 payments
  11. Other $7,381 350 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $16,640 803 payments
  2. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $4,470 3 payments
  3. Education $285 11 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. IBRANCE $4,624 13 payments
  2. ENHERTU Oncology $1,455 71 payments
  3. KEYTRUDA $1,287 75 payments
  4. DARZALEX $658 28 payments
  5. OPDIVO $520 25 payments
  6. TUKYSA $477 21 payments
  7. TECVAYLI $469 16 payments
  8. KISQALI $438 18 payments
  9. LYNPARZA $435 24 payments
  10. ENHERTU Oncology $339 12 payments
  11. Other $14,508 732 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Research payments came from Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Pfizer Inc. $7,010 7 payments

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 36 drugs

Part D claims

1,787

Median for Medical Oncology: 414

Drug cost

$3,688,773

Median for Medical Oncology: $849,427

Branded share of claims

21.2%

Median for Medical Oncology: 28.5%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Ibrance Palbociclib Brand 77 $1,178,573
Revlimid Lenalidomide Brand 34 $607,365
Verzenio Abemaciclib Brand 34 $526,600
Calquence Acalabrutinib Maleate Brand 36 $413,609
Xtandi Enzalutamide Brand 30 $395,884
Tasigna Nilotinib Hcl Brand 12 $231,639
Kisqali Ribociclib Succinate Brand 11 $146,293
Venclexta Venetoclax Brand 12 $85,889
Abiraterone Acetate Generic 13 $29,250
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 48 $28,057

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 36 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 3,431 Part D prescribers listed as Medical Oncology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 13 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$45,433

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

367

Average age 74

Services billed

823

310 women, 57 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
Cancer 73%
High blood pressure 71%
Arthritis 51%
Chronic kidney disease 29%
Osteoporosis 28%
Depression 22%
Diabetes 20%
Ischemic heart disease 20%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 70 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
ENHERTU
  • Daiichi Sankyo Inc. $238
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $123
$361 — —
KEYTRUDA
  • Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $170
$170 — —
Lenvima
  • Eisai Inc. $106
$106 — —
REBLOZYL
  • Celgene Corporation $101
$101 — —
DARZALEX
  • Janssen Biotech, Inc. $96
$96 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 70 with Patron

Records

824 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Medical Oncology in Missouri

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record