Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Alison Conlin

Medical Oncology Portland, OR Medical Doctor

NPI 1841460193 CMS profile 174897

4805 Ne Glisan St, Ste 6N50, Portland, OR 97213

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$84,718

104 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$6,591

Paid to them · 6 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$2,392,315 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2019–2025

Through program year 2025, Alison Conlin of Portland, OR is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $84,718 across 104 general payments and $6,591 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $2,392,315 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 87th percentile of Medical Oncology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

11 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $13,814 21
2024 General $10,006 8
2024 Research $2,160 1
2023 General $14,528 17
2022 General $12,693 16
2021 General $13,561 12
2021 Research $1,580 2
2020 General $16,889 18
2020 Research $1,410 2
2019 General $3,228 12
2019 Research $1,441 1

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Alison Conlin
  • Medical Oncology median
  • Middle half of Medical Oncology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Alison Conlin were reported at $13,814. Among 3,316 Medical Oncology profiles paid that year, the median was $1,128 and the middle half received between $147 and $5,675.

Show as a table
Year Alison Conlin Medical Oncology median Middle half National median
2019 $3,228 $968 $140–$6,658 $163
2020 $16,889 $747 $102–$5,891 $114
2021 $13,561 $430 $50–$4,098 $132
2022 $12,693 $812 $127–$4,907 $149
2023 $14,528 $957 $144–$5,248 $160
2024 $10,006 $1,042 $149–$5,650 $164
2025 $13,814 $1,128 $147–$5,675 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Seattle Genetics, Inc. $30,821 32 payments
  2. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $22,183 26 payments
  3. Pfizer Inc. $8,163 5 payments
  4. Stemline Therapeutics Inc. $6,499 7 payments
  5. Daiichi Sankyo Inc. $5,780 7 payments
  6. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $4,174 6 payments
  7. Genentech USA, Inc. $3,102 5 payments
  8. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $1,370 1 payment
  9. Gilead Sciences, Inc. $1,358 8 payments
  10. F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG $1,167 4 payments
  11. Other $101 3 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Consulting Fee $68,017 36 payments
  2. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $10,925 12 payments
  3. Food and Beverage $2,874 42 payments
  4. Travel and Lodging $2,823 10 payments
  5. Education $79 4 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. TUKYSA $22,385 18 payments
  2. IBRANCE $8,038 4 payments
  3. ENHERTU Oncology $7,856 12 payments
  4. ENHERTU Oncology $5,698 6 payments
  5. LYNPARZA $3,630 2 payments
  6. Kadcyla $3,158 6 payments
  7. PIQRAY $2,700 1 payment
  8. Orserdu $2,419 5 payments
  9. Perjeta $2,074 3 payments
  10. Phesgo $2,074 3 payments
  11. Other $7,929 18 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Research payments came from Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG $3,803 3 payments
  2. Eli Lilly and Company $2,788 3 payments

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 26 drugs

Part D claims

1,009

Median for Medical Oncology: 414

Drug cost

$1,145,886

Median for Medical Oncology: $849,427

Branded share of claims

16.6%

Median for Medical Oncology: 28.5%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Ibrance Palbociclib Brand 36 $583,932
Verzenio Abemaciclib Brand 21 $314,987
Kisqali Ribociclib Succinate Brand 19 $191,295
Everolimus Generic 14 $22,626
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 12 $11,198
Anastrozole Generic 340 $8,179
Exemestane Generic 55 $5,822
Letrozole Generic 151 $3,050
Tamoxifen Citrate Generic 34 $1,002
Raloxifene Hcl Generic 18 $782

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 26 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 3,431 Part D prescribers listed as Medical Oncology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 13 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$32,039

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

141

Average age 73

Services billed

588

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
Cancer 75%
High blood pressure 61%
Arthritis 38%
Osteoporosis 33%
Diabetes 24%
Depression 22%
Chronic kidney disease 14%
Ischemic heart disease 11%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

4 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
IBRANCE
  • PFIZER INC. $5,423
$5,423 36 —
ENHERTU
  • Daiichi Sankyo Inc. $1,665
$1,665 — —
Truqap
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $1,665
$1,665 — —
KISQALI
  • Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $45
$45 19 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

Records

110 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record