Research study Program year 2024 Source: CMS Open Payments

TRuE AD2-An Efficacy and Safety Study of Ruxolitinib Cream in Adolescents and Adults With Atopic Dermatitis

Research payments

$209,665

271 payments

Through program year 2024, $209,665 in research payments was reported against TRuE AD2-An Efficacy and Safety Study of Ruxolitinib Cream in Adolescents and Adults With Atopic Dermatitis, across 271 payments, paid by Incyte Corporation.

Paid by
Incyte Corporation
ClinicalTrials.gov
No trial number was reported for this study

By program year

5 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2024 Research $28,872 9
2023 Research $34,613 34
2022 Research $52,829 73
2021 Research $92,175 153
2019 Research $1,176 2

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program years 2019–2024
  1. Incyte Corporation $209,665 271 payments
Who received the money Research payments · program years 2019–2024
  1. Ohsu Hospital And Clinics Teaching hospital · OR $42,885 53 payments
  2. The Regents of the University of California San Diego Organisation paid for research $27,839 39 payments
  3. Oregon Medical Research Center Organisation paid for research $25,986 29 payments
  4. Dermresearch Organisation paid for research $25,307 35 payments
  5. The George Washington University Hospital Organisation paid for research $21,985 31 payments
  6. Henry Ford Hospital Teaching hospital · MI $9,795 9 payments
  7. Hospital Of The Univ Of Penna Teaching hospital · PA $6,416 4 payments
  8. Washington University Cancer Center Phar Organisation paid for research $5,759 7 payments
  9. Nyu Langone Health Organisation paid for research $5,365 8 payments
  10. Rady Children's Hospital - San Diego Organisation paid for research $5,316 4 payments

Usually the institution or organisation running the study, not a person.

Every payment, record by record

Date, amount, who was paid and what for — filter by year and kind, or download as CSV, free, in files of 5,000 rows.

Principal investigators named

10 shown

Named on the study's payments. Being named is not being paid: the money in the figures above went to the recipients listed, not necessarily to these people.

What you are looking at

Research payments are tied to a study. Being named on a study as a principal investigator is reported separately from being paid as a recipient, and the two are not the same thing — a named investigator has not necessarily received the money.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2024

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record