Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Brian Kim

Dermatology Saint Louis, MO Medical Doctor

NPI 1336331826 CMS profile 515404

4901 Forest Park Ave, Div Im Dermatology, Ste 502, Saint Louis, MO 63108

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$860,995

475 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$67,823

Paid to them · 81 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$1,442,369 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2019–2024

Through program year 2025, Brian Kim of Saint Louis, MO is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $860,995 across 475 general payments and $67,823 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $1,442,369 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 99th percentile of Dermatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

14 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $138,864 69
2025 Research $6,397 6
2024 General $164,474 122
2024 Research $14,695 20
2023 General $239,573 106
2023 Research $34,313 35
2022 General $145,478 78
2022 Research $5,730 11
2021 General $76,620 43
2021 Research $1,270 2
2020 General $50,780 30
2020 Research $4,008 3
2019 General $45,206 27
2019 Research $1,409 4

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Brian Kim
  • Dermatology median
  • Middle half of Dermatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Brian Kim were reported at $138,864. Among 10,363 Dermatology profiles paid that year, the median was $788 and the middle half received between $207 and $1,974.

Show as a table
Year Brian Kim Dermatology median Middle half National median
2019 $45,206 $454 $129–$1,240 $163
2020 $50,780 $235 $81–$756 $114
2021 $76,620 $377 $108–$1,108 $132
2022 $145,478 $514 $143–$1,391 $149
2023 $239,573 $607 $159–$1,674 $160
2024 $164,474 $751 $204–$1,903 $164
2025 $138,864 $788 $207–$1,974 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Genzyme Corporation $448,172 144 payments
  2. Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC $86,096 34 payments
  3. Pfizer Inc. $70,488 39 payments
  4. LEO Pharma AS $32,125 8 payments
  5. Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $31,613 26 payments
  6. Galderma Laboratories, L.P. $27,937 20 payments
  7. AbbVie, Inc. $24,142 47 payments
  8. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $22,290 15 payments
  9. Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $21,290 35 payments
  10. Eli Lilly and Company $18,666 13 payments
  11. Other $78,177 94 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Consulting Fee $506,641 113 payments
  2. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $234,107 42 payments
  3. Travel and Lodging $85,394 97 payments
  4. Honoraria $26,100 8 payments
  5. Food and Beverage $8,719 213 payments
  6. Education $35 2 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. DUPIXENT Immunology $323,200 110 payments
  2. DUPIXENT Inflammation And Immunology $47,442 50 payments
  3. DUPIXENT Immunology $38,106 11 payments
  4. NEMLUVIO $15,881 13 payments
  5. EUCRISA $14,472 5 payments
  6. LITFULO $12,338 4 payments
  7. CIBINQO $10,004 19 payments
  8. DUPIXENT Immunology And Inflammation $5,244 9 payments
  9. COSENTYX $3,600 1 payment
  10. RINVOQ $3,184 26 payments
  11. Other $4,495 76 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Research payments came from Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $28,883 29 payments
  2. Pfizer Inc. $27,440 26 payments
  3. Genzyme Corporation $10,750 24 payments
  4. Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC $750 2 payments

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 5 drugs

Part D claims

121

Median for Dermatology: 534

Drug cost

$202,850

Median for Dermatology: $67,151

Branded share of claims

52.1%

Median for Dermatology: 8.1%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Dupixent Pen Dupilumab Brand 29 $106,806
Xolair Omalizumab Brand 17 $60,548
Opzelura Ruxolitinib Phosphate Brand 17 $34,431
Butorphanol Tartrate Generic 34 $881
Gabapentin Generic 24 $184

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 13,550 Part D prescribers listed as Dermatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 11 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
DUPIXENT
  • GENZYME CORPORATION $38,073
  • SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. LLC $21,170
  • Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $2,949
$62,192 29 —
LITFULO
  • PFIZER INC. $3,650
$3,650 — —
CIBINQO
  • PFIZER INC. $1,127
$1,127 — —
OFEV
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $139
$139 — —
RINVOQ
  • AbbVie, Inc. $97
$97 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 11 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

556 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Dermatology in Missouri

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record