Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Seth Forman

Dermatology Tampa, FL Medical Doctor

NPI 1346304540 CMS profile 16149

4915 Ehrlich Rd, Tampa, FL 33624

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$407,226

1,076 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$173,995

Paid to them · 66 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$27,813,970 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2019–2025

Through program year 2025, Seth Forman of Tampa, FL is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $407,226 across 1,076 general payments and $173,995 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $27,813,970 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 98th percentile of Dermatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

12 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $1,716 85
2024 General $61,830 165
2023 General $62,081 208
2023 Research $71,985 18
2022 General $118,019 202
2022 Research $5,886 8
2021 General $36,803 138
2021 Research $7,100 7
2020 General $31,747 78
2020 Research $25,175 17
2019 General $95,029 200
2019 Research $63,850 16

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Seth Forman
  • Dermatology median
  • Middle half of Dermatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Seth Forman were reported at $1,716. Among 10,363 Dermatology profiles paid that year, the median was $788 and the middle half received between $207 and $1,974.

Show as a table
Year Seth Forman Dermatology median Middle half National median
2019 $95,029 $454 $129–$1,240 $163
2020 $31,747 $235 $81–$756 $114
2021 $36,803 $377 $108–$1,108 $132
2022 $118,019 $514 $143–$1,391 $149
2023 $62,081 $607 $159–$1,674 $160
2024 $61,830 $751 $204–$1,903 $164
2025 $1,716 $788 $207–$1,974 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Lilly USA, LLC $174,248 180 payments
  2. Pfizer Inc. $78,181 102 payments
  3. Eli Lilly and Company $43,396 85 payments
  4. UCB, Inc. $37,150 62 payments
  5. Janssen Research & Development, LLC $22,056 4 payments
  6. Horizon Therapeutics plc $13,774 3 payments
  7. Dermira, Inc. $10,191 6 payments
  8. Incyte Corporation $7,544 31 payments
  9. AbbVie, Inc. $5,028 107 payments
  10. Merz North America, Inc. $3,582 26 payments
  11. Other $12,074 470 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $260,245 95 payments
  2. Consulting Fee $97,485 32 payments
  3. Food and Beverage $22,972 885 payments
  4. Travel and Lodging $18,353 58 payments
  5. Honoraria $7,700 1 payment
  6. Education $472 5 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. TALTZ $112,098 111 payments
  2. OLUMIANT $46,257 23 payments
  3. CIBINQO $44,955 69 payments
  4. Bimzelx $29,474 36 payments
  5. LITFULO $17,930 38 payments
  6. KRYSTEXXA $13,774 3 payments
  7. QBREXZA $10,139 2 payments
  8. Xeomin $2,316 15 payments
  9. ASCLERA $1,638 7 payments
  10. COSENTYX $1,615 9 payments
  11. Other $16,406 795 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Research payments came from Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Pfizer Inc. $86,898 31 payments
  2. Eli Lilly and Company $84,859 32 payments
  3. Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $2,238 3 payments

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 17 drugs

Part D claims

715

Median for Dermatology: 534

Drug cost

$1,124,466

Median for Dermatology: $67,151

Branded share of claims

19.9%

Median for Dermatology: 8.1%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Bimzelx Autoinjector Bimekizumab-Bkzx Brand 34 $496,902
Humira(Cf) Pen Adalimumab Brand 28 $308,811
Taltz Autoinjector Ixekizumab Brand 21 $143,939
Dupixent Pen Dupilumab Brand 31 $102,815
Otezla Apremilast Brand 12 $55,776
Clobetasol Propionate Generic 147 $5,968
Fluorouracil Generic 50 $3,147
Triamcinolone Acetonide Generic 137 $2,494
Minocycline Hcl Generic 92 $1,394
Imiquimod Generic 16 $583

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 17 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 13,550 Part D prescribers listed as Dermatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 43 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$139,982

Of which drugs: $2,537

Medicare patients

743

Average age 75

Services billed

5,590

323 women, 420 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 50%
Ischemic heart disease 41%
Diabetes 26%
Chronic kidney disease 26%
Atrial fibrillation 20%
Cancer 17%
Heart failure 15%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 30 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
Bimzelx
$23,741 34 —
CIBINQO
$14,148 — —
LITFULO
$8,866 — —
DUPIXENT
$301 31 —
RINVOQ
$220 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 30 with Patron

Records

1,142 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Dermatology in Florida

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record