Doctor of Osteopathy Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

John Minni

Dermatology Stuart, FL Doctor of Osteopathy

NPI 1144303009 CMS profile 324177

2601 S Kanner Hwy, Stuart, FL 34994

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$1,385,124

2,023 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, John Minni of Stuart, FL is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $1,385,124 across 2,023 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 99th percentile of Dermatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $327,554 490
2024 General $244,852 410
2023 General $238,268 314
2022 General $154,961 234
2021 General $133,963 170
2020 General $95,951 142
2019 General $189,574 263

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • John Minni
  • Dermatology median
  • Middle half of Dermatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to John Minni were reported at $327,554. Among 10,363 Dermatology profiles paid that year, the median was $788 and the middle half received between $207 and $1,974.

Show as a table
Year John Minni Dermatology median Middle half National median
2019 $189,574 $454 $129–$1,240 $163
2020 $95,951 $235 $81–$756 $114
2021 $133,963 $377 $108–$1,108 $132
2022 $154,961 $514 $143–$1,391 $149
2023 $238,268 $607 $159–$1,674 $160
2024 $244,852 $751 $204–$1,903 $164
2025 $327,554 $788 $207–$1,974 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $226,800 287 payments
  2. AbbVie, Inc. $198,722 291 payments
  3. Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC $162,202 125 payments
  4. Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $147,228 223 payments
  5. UCB, Inc. $143,846 166 payments
  6. Genzyme Corporation $96,012 98 payments
  7. Amgen Inc. $77,120 114 payments
  8. Galderma Laboratories, L.P. $67,061 99 payments
  9. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $59,495 82 payments
  10. Incyte Corporation $51,476 94 payments
  11. Other $155,161 444 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $1,209,754 488 payments
  2. Consulting Fee $66,248 38 payments
  3. Travel and Lodging $41,484 297 payments
  4. Food and Beverage $41,383 1,171 payments
  5. Honoraria $24,831 7 payments
  6. Education $1,424 22 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. TREMFYA $388,447 356 payments
  2. SKYRIZI $133,646 152 payments
  3. Bimzelx $132,966 142 payments
  4. DUPIXENT Inflammation And Immunology $110,830 188 payments
  5. DUPIXENT Immunology $107,458 109 payments
  6. Otezla $71,563 109 payments
  7. OPZELURA $51,396 93 payments
  8. SOTYKTU $47,582 84 payments
  9. COSENTYX $40,807 45 payments
  10. DUPIXENT Immunology And Inflammation $36,398 35 payments
  11. Other $299,887 738 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 69 drugs

Part D claims

8,245

Median for Dermatology: 534

Drug cost

$4,602,356

Median for Dermatology: $67,151

Branded share of claims

16.3%

Median for Dermatology: 8.1%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Skyrizi Pen Risankizumab-Rzaa Brand 48 $980,008
Tremfya Guselkumab Brand 46 $630,293
Dupixent Pen Dupilumab Brand 151 $596,533
Odomzo Sonidegib Phosphate Brand 34 $423,849
Bimzelx Autoinjector Bimekizumab-Bkzx Brand 23 $346,761
Dupixent Syringe Dupilumab Brand 80 $306,105
Skyrizi Risankizumab-Rzaa Brand 11 $229,474
Sotyktu Deucravacitinib Brand 22 $179,670
Humira(Cf) Pen Adalimumab Brand 13 $165,234
Humira Pen Adalimumab Brand 17 $136,756

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 69 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 13,550 Part D prescribers listed as Dermatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 43 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$637,988

Of which drugs: $34

Medicare patients

3,260

Average age 75

Services billed

17,495

1,569 women, 1,691 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 73%
Arthritis 48%
Ischemic heart disease 30%
Diabetes 24%
Chronic kidney disease 19%
Cancer 18%
Atrial fibrillation 17%
Depression 17%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 31 44 $34

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 20 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
TREMFYA
$64,343 46 —
DUPIXENT
$53,268 231 —
Bimzelx
$46,032 23 —
SOTYKTU
$24,829 22 —
SKYRIZI
$14,605 59 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 20 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

2,023 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Dermatology in Florida

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record