Research study Program year 2025 Source: CMS Open Payments

The Peerless II Study

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06055920

Research payments

$1,561,103

951 payments

Through program year 2025, $1,561,103 in research payments was reported against The Peerless II Study, across 951 payments.

Paid by (largest first)
Stryker Corporation; Inari Medical, Inc.
ClinicalTrials.gov
NCT06055920

By program year

1 row
Year Kind Amount Payments
2025 Research $1,561,103 951

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program year 2025
  1. Stryker Corporation $1,525,032 938 payments
  2. Inari Medical, Inc. $36,071 13 payments
Who received the money Research payments · program year 2025
  1. Hca Research Institute LLC Organisation paid for research $142,931 147 payments
  2. University of Pittsburgh Physicians Organisation paid for research $132,860 87 payments
  3. Advocate Aurora Research Institute LLC Organisation paid for research $132,690 38 payments
  4. Texas Health Research And Education Institute Organisation paid for research $106,177 65 payments
  5. Yale University Organisation paid for research $82,430 21 payments
  6. Adventhealth Orlando Teaching hospital · FL $75,528 40 payments
  7. University Of Rochester Organisation paid for research $73,485 63 payments
  8. The Ohio State University Organisation paid for research $64,608 18 payments
  9. Brany LLC Organisation paid for research $56,131 34 payments
  10. AdventHealth Orlando Organisation paid for research $44,664 22 payments

Usually the institution or organisation running the study, not a person.

Every payment, record by record

Date, amount, who was paid and what for — filter by year and kind, or download as CSV, free, in files of 5,000 rows.

Principal investigators named

10 shown

Named on the study's payments. Being named is not being paid: the money in the figures above went to the recipients listed, not necessarily to these people.

What you are looking at

Research payments are tied to a study. Being named on a study as a principal investigator is reported separately from being paid as a recipient, and the two are not the same thing — a named investigator has not necessarily received the money.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record