Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Matthew Sample

Cardiovascular Disease Birmingham, AL Medical Doctor

NPI 1871736637 CMS profile 416655

3980 Colonnade Pkwy, Birmingham, AL 35243

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$16,776

169 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$48,649 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2024–2025

Through program year 2025, Matthew Sample of Birmingham, AL is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $16,776 across 169 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $48,649 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 87th percentile of Cardiovascular Disease profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $2,331 30
2024 General $4,192 46
2023 General $1,790 38
2022 General $719 14
2021 General $966 16
2020 General $5,798 10
2019 General $981 15

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Matthew Sample
  • Cardiovascular Disease median
  • Middle half of Cardiovascular Disease
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Matthew Sample were reported at $2,331. Among 16,617 Cardiovascular Disease profiles paid that year, the median was $432 and the middle half received between $132 and $1,252.

Show as a table
Year Matthew Sample Cardiovascular Disease median Middle half National median
2019 $981 $450 $127–$1,392 $163
2020 $5,798 $242 $77–$751 $114
2021 $966 $335 $101–$1,037 $132
2022 $719 $395 $121–$1,211 $149
2023 $1,790 $443 $136–$1,283 $160
2024 $4,192 $450 $136–$1,323 $164
2025 $2,331 $432 $132–$1,252 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Abbott Laboratories $10,843 61 payments
  2. Edwards Lifesciences Corporation $2,259 35 payments
  3. Medtronic, Inc. $665 9 payments
  4. Inari Medical, Inc. $623 12 payments
  5. Philips Electronics North America Corporation $530 10 payments
  6. Shockwave Medical, Inc $393 2 payments
  7. Boston Scientific Corporation $321 3 payments
  8. W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. $254 3 payments
  9. CVRx, Inc. $183 3 payments
  10. ZOLL Services LLC (A/K/A ZOLL LifeCor Corp) $145 10 payments
  11. Other $559 21 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $8,754 153 payments
  2. Compensation for serving as faculty or as a speaker for a non-accredited and noncertified continuing education program $4,650 3 payments
  3. Travel and Lodging $3,372 13 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Mitra Clip system $5,867 10 payments
  2. MITRACLIP Vascular $997 16 payments
  3. MITRACLIP Vascular $785 3 payments
  4. FLOWTRIEVER CATHETER, S $667 12 payments
  5. TRICLIP $588 8 payments
  6. SAPIEN 3 Ultra RESILIA $524 8 payments
  7. AMPLATZER $459 3 payments
  8. CT THROMBECTOMY SYSTEM KIT $435 10 payments
  9. Shockwave IVL System with the Shockwave C2 Coronary IVL Catheter $393 2 payments
  10. EDWARDS SAPIEN 3 TRANSCATHETER HEART VALVE (THV) $312 4 payments
  11. Other $3,629 80 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 48 drugs

Part D claims

5,431

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$987,591

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

26.4%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 458 $421,720
Entresto Sacubitril/Valsartan Brand 215 $199,560
Camzyos Mavacamten Brand 12 $98,386
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 101 $93,137
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 41 $47,254
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 28 $19,516
Repatha Sureclick Evolocumab Brand 21 $17,886
Atorvastatin Calcium Generic 562 $9,956
Vascepa Icosapent Ethyl Brand 16 $9,707
Metoprolol Succinate Generic 478 $8,806

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 48 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 77 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$158,976

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

893

Average age 77

Services billed

2,743

441 women, 452 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Ischemic heart disease 60%
Arthritis 56%
Atrial fibrillation 44%
Diabetes 40%
Chronic kidney disease 39%
Heart failure 38%
Depression 26%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

1 product · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
XIFAXAN
  • Salix Pharmaceuticals, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC $45
$45 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

Records

169 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Cardiovascular Disease in Alabama

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record