Research study Program year 2025 Source: CMS Open Payments

Long-Term Extension Study (Atdvance) to Evaluate the Safety and Effica

Research payments

$450,988

165 payments

Through program year 2025, $450,988 in research payments was reported against Long-Term Extension Study (Atdvance) to Evaluate the Safety and Effica, across 165 payments, paid by GlaxoSmithKline, LLC..

Paid by
GlaxoSmithKline, LLC.
ClinicalTrials.gov
No trial number was reported for this study

By program year

2 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2025 Research $267,750 124
2024 Research $183,238 41

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program years 2024–2025
  1. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $450,988 165 payments
Who received the money Research payments · program years 2024–2025
  1. Javara INC Organisation paid for research $87,289 22 payments
  2. Cr Services Acquisition US LLC Dba Centricity Research Organisation paid for research $74,391 65 payments
  3. Nuline Clinical Trial Center Organisation paid for research $57,777 20 payments
  4. First Oc Dermatology Research INC Organisation paid for research $45,109 15 payments
  5. Clinical Science Institute Organisation paid for research $31,003 3 payments
  6. Floridian Clinical Research LLC Organisation paid for research $23,802 7 payments
  7. Cognitive Clinical Trials LLC Organisation paid for research $22,378 5 payments
  8. Sadick Research Group Organisation paid for research $19,287 4 payments
  9. Elligo Health Research INC Organisation paid for research $18,350 4 payments
  10. Activmed Practices And Research LLC Organisation paid for research $17,500 4 payments

Usually the institution or organisation running the study, not a person.

Every payment, record by record

Date, amount, who was paid and what for — filter by year and kind, or download as CSV, free, in files of 5,000 rows.

Principal investigators named

10 shown

Named on the study's payments. Being named is not being paid: the money in the figures above went to the recipients listed, not necessarily to these people.

What you are looking at

Research payments are tied to a study. Being named on a study as a principal investigator is reported separately from being paid as a recipient, and the two are not the same thing — a named investigator has not necessarily received the money.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record