Organisation paid for research Program year 2025 Source: CMS Open Payments

Elligo Health Research Inc

Neither a doctor nor a teaching hospital

Research payments

$109,891,649

28,810 payments

Through program year 2025, Elligo Health Research Inc is reported as receiving $109,891,649 in research payments, across 28,810 payments.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2025 Research $22,246,314 1,683
2024 Research $20,905,770 1,948
2023 Research $26,660,115 12,321
2022 Research $32,981,829 11,968
2021 Research $5,822,107 663
2020 Research $737,635 141
2019 Research $537,879 86

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Moderna TX, Inc. $44,303,058 22,446 payments
  2. Pfizer Inc. $17,919,951 829 payments
  3. Eli Lilly and Company $12,724,411 171 payments
  4. Amgen Inc. $4,870,238 68 payments
  5. Lexicon Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $3,865,101 359 payments
  6. Sanofi US Services Inc. $3,413,682 335 payments
  7. Genentech, Inc. $3,221,921 387 payments
  8. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $2,985,503 54 payments
  9. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $1,676,044 368 payments
  10. Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $1,617,028 192 payments
Studies the money was for Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. A Phase 3, Randomized, Stratified, Observer-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Immunogenicity of mRNA-1273 SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine in Adults Aged 18 Years and Older $12,314,793 604 payments
  2. A Phase 2/3, Randomized, Observer-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of mRNA-1345, an mRNA Vaccine Targeting Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV), in Adults 60 Years of Age $10,554,730 73 payments
  3. A Phase 3, Randomized, Observer-blind, Active-controlled Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of mRNA-1010 Candidate Seasonal Influenza Vaccine in Adults 50 Years and Older $7,229,635 10,637 payments
  4. A Phase 3 Randomized Observerblinded Study to Evaluate the Efficacy Safety Tolerability and Immunogenicity of A Modified Rna Vaccine Against Influenza Compared to Licensed Inactivated Influenza Vaccine in Healthy Adults 18 Years of Age Or Older $6,928,926 266 payments
  5. A Phase 3, Randomized, Observer-blind, Active-controlled Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of mRNA-1010 Candidate Seasonal Influenza Vaccine in Adults 50 Years and Older $5,735,092 8,176 payments
  6. A Phase 3 Study to Evaluate the Efficacy Immunogenicity and Safety of Respiratory Syncytial Virus RSV Prefusion F Subunit Vaccine in Adults $3,140,186 110 payments
  7. A Phase 2 Randomized Doubleblind Placebo Controlled Dose Ranging Dose Finding Parallel Group Study to Assess Efficacy and Safety of Pf07081532 and Open Label Oral Semaglutide in Adults With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus T2dm Inadequately Controlled on Metformin and Separately Pf07081532 Compared to Matching Placebo in Adults With Obesity But Without T2dm $3,120,465 30 payments
  8. A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Investigate the Effect of Lepodisiran on the Reduction of Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Adults With Elevated Lipoprotein(A) Who Have Established Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Or Are at Risk for A First Cardiovascular Event - Acclaim-Lp(A) $2,743,818 17 payments
  9. Lx9211.1-204-Dpn $2,400,788 221 payments
  10. A Phase 3 Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Maridebart Cafraglutide in Adult Participants Without Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Who Have Obesity or Are Overweight $2,214,475 2 payments
What the money was spent on Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Patient care $2,393,294 202 payments

Only reported on some payments, and a payment can report more than one category, so these amounts overlap.

What you are looking at

A noncovered recipient is an organisation paid for research that is neither an individual clinician nor a teaching hospital — typically a contract research organisation, a foundation or a trial site network. They receive 81% of all reported research money, which is why they appear here at all.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record