Organisation paid for research Program year 2025 Source: CMS Open Payments

Javara Inc

Neither a doctor nor a teaching hospital

Research payments

$44,174,849

4,916 payments

Through program year 2025, Javara Inc is reported as receiving $44,174,849 in research payments, across 4,916 payments.

By program year

6 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2025 Research $10,222,624 1,284
2024 Research $9,186,151 716
2023 Research $4,427,484 1,662
2022 Research $14,029,349 976
2021 Research $6,288,240 276
2020 Research $21,000 2

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program years 2020–2025
  1. Moderna TX, Inc. $28,989,723 2,094 payments
  2. Pfizer Inc. $6,456,512 528 payments
  3. Organon LLC $1,713,726 214 payments
  4. Sanofi US Services Inc. $1,485,933 147 payments
  5. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $1,483,536 412 payments
  6. Alnylam Pharmaceuticals Inc. $1,274,115 862 payments
  7. Sanofi Pasteur Inc. $517,872 77 payments
  8. AbbVie, Inc. $428,473 124 payments
  9. Genentech, Inc. $338,323 61 payments
  10. Mylan Inc. $239,606 61 payments
Studies the money was for Research payments · program years 2020–2025
  1. A Phase 2/3, Two-Part, Open-Label, Dose Escalation, Age De-escalation and Randomized, Observer Blind, Placebo-Controlled Expansion Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, Reactogenicity, and Effectiveness of mRNA 1273 SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine in Health $10,329,245 154 payments
  2. A Phase 3, Randomized, Stratified, Observer-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Immunogenicity of mRNA-1273 SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine in Adults Aged 18 Years and Older $4,650,217 299 payments
  3. A Phase 3 Study to Evaluate the Efficacy Immunogenicity and Safety of Respiratory Syncytial Virus RSV Prefusion F Subunit Vaccine in Adults $4,515,585 297 payments
  4. A Phase 3, Randomized, Observer-blind, Active-controlled, Case-drivenStudy to Investigate the Safety, Efficacy, and Immunogenicity of mRNA-1010 Candidate Seasonal Influenza Vaccine Compared with a Licensed Inactivated Seasonal Influenza Vaccine in Adults 50 Years of Age $3,980,852 40 payments
  5. A Study to Investigate the Safety and Efficacy of mRNA-1403 in Participants ?18 Years of Age for the Prevention of Acute Gastroenteritis $3,635,737 376 payments
  6. A Study of mRNA-1010 Compared With a Licensed Influenza Vaccine in Adults ?50 Years of Age $3,045,042 224 payments
  7. A Phase 3, Randomized, Observer-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Mrna-1403, A Multivalent Candidate Vaccine to Prevent Norovirus Acute Gastroenteritis in Adults 18 Years of Age $1,654,725 38 payments
  8. Og-8175A-023 $1,093,559 147 payments
  9. A Phase 3 Randomized Observerblinded Study to Evaluate the Efficacy Safety Tolerability and Immunogenicity of A Modified Rna Vaccine Against Influenza Compared to Licensed Inactivated Influenza Vaccine in Healthy Adults 18 Years of Age Or Older $1,033,092 69 payments
  10. A Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of ALN-AGT01 in Patients With Mild To-Moderate Hypertension (KARDIA-1) $708,161 655 payments
What the money was spent on Research payments · program years 2020–2025
  1. Patient care $1,713,726 214 payments

Only reported on some payments, and a payment can report more than one category, so these amounts overlap.

What you are looking at

A noncovered recipient is an organisation paid for research that is neither an individual clinician nor a teaching hospital — typically a contract research organisation, a foundation or a trial site network. They receive 81% of all reported research money, which is why they appear here at all.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record