Research study Program year 2020 Source: CMS Open Payments

Ds8201-A-U302

Research payments

$979,218

231 payments

Through program year 2020, $979,218 in research payments was reported against Ds8201-A-U302, across 231 payments, paid by Daiichi Sankyo Inc..

Paid by
Daiichi Sankyo Inc.
ClinicalTrials.gov
No trial number was reported for this study

By program year

1 row
Year Kind Amount Payments
2020 Research $979,218 231

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program year 2020
  1. Daiichi Sankyo Inc. $979,218 231 payments
Who received the money Research payments · program year 2020
  1. Sarah Cannon Research Institute, LLC Organisation paid for research $223,380 82 payments
  2. University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio Organisation paid for research $206,719 20 payments
  3. Innovative Clinical Research Institute, LLC Organisation paid for research $191,834 39 payments
  4. Precision Cancer Research LLC Organisation paid for research $76,007 16 payments
  5. Sharp Memorial Hospital Organisation paid for research $72,336 8 payments
  6. Waldron Medical Research & Development, LLC Organisation paid for research $53,468 5 payments
  7. The Methodist Hospital Research Institute Organisation paid for research $33,724 3 payments
  8. Ronald Reagan Ucla Teaching hospital · CA $23,135 9 payments
  9. Vanderbilt University Medical Center Teaching hospital · TN $16,307 8 payments
  10. Wake Forest University Health Sciences Organisation paid for research $14,240 4 payments

Usually the institution or organisation running the study, not a person.

Every payment, record by record

Date, amount, who was paid and what for — filter by year and kind, or download as CSV, free, in files of 5,000 rows.

Principal investigators named

10 shown

Named on the study's payments. Being named is not being paid: the money in the figures above went to the recipients listed, not necessarily to these people.

What you are looking at

Research payments are tied to a study. Being named on a study as a principal investigator is reported separately from being paid as a recipient, and the two are not the same thing — a named investigator has not necessarily received the money.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2020

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record