Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Virginia Kaklamani

Medical Oncology San Antonio, TX Medical Doctor

NPI 1841235439 CMS profile 129081

7979 Wurzbach Rd Fl Z5, San Antonio, TX 78229

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$787,450

556 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$8,611

Paid to them · 12 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$4,682,322 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2019–2025

Through program year 2025, Virginia Kaklamani of San Antonio, TX is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $787,450 across 556 general payments and $8,611 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $4,682,322 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 98th percentile of Medical Oncology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

12 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $89,929 70
2025 Research $223 1
2024 General $97,173 68
2024 Research $3,448 1
2023 General $86,075 57
2023 Research $724 1
2022 General $114,557 76
2022 Research $2,422 2
2021 General $140,670 93
2021 Research $1,794 7
2020 General $103,066 67
2019 General $155,980 125

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Virginia Kaklamani
  • Medical Oncology median
  • Middle half of Medical Oncology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Virginia Kaklamani were reported at $89,929. Among 3,316 Medical Oncology profiles paid that year, the median was $1,128 and the middle half received between $147 and $5,675.

Show as a table
Year Virginia Kaklamani Medical Oncology median Middle half National median
2019 $155,980 $968 $140–$6,658 $163
2020 $103,066 $747 $102–$5,891 $114
2021 $140,670 $430 $50–$4,098 $132
2022 $114,557 $812 $127–$4,907 $149
2023 $86,075 $957 $144–$5,248 $160
2024 $97,173 $1,042 $149–$5,650 $164
2025 $89,929 $1,128 $147–$5,675 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Gilead Sciences, Inc. $216,032 118 payments
  2. Pfizer Inc. $86,055 37 payments
  3. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $77,541 90 payments
  4. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $74,983 69 payments
  5. Stemline Therapeutics Inc. $54,675 27 payments
  6. Genentech USA, Inc. $52,614 29 payments
  7. Puma Biotechnology, Inc. $40,241 40 payments
  8. Daiichi Sankyo Inc. $37,118 30 payments
  9. Lilly USA, LLC $35,382 13 payments
  10. Celgene Corporation $34,318 21 payments
  11. Other $78,490 82 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $487,721 213 payments
  2. Consulting Fee $245,147 113 payments
  3. Travel and Lodging $35,729 75 payments
  4. Honoraria $9,269 7 payments
  5. Food and Beverage $7,502 124 payments
  6. Long term medical supply or device loan $1,747 19 payments
  7. Grant $250 1 payment
  8. Education $85 4 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Trodelvy $212,829 114 payments
  2. KISQALI $53,177 48 payments
  3. TALZENNA $52,181 26 payments
  4. Orserdu $45,601 23 payments
  5. NERLYNX $40,241 40 payments
  6. ENHERTU $35,613 28 payments
  7. Phesgo $35,209 19 payments
  8. PIQRAY $34,994 22 payments
  9. Abraxane $32,809 16 payments
  10. IBRANCE $31,433 17 payments
  11. Other $154,884 145 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Research payments came from Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Eli Lilly and Company $6,594 4 payments
  2. Radius Health, Inc. $1,490 6 payments
  3. F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG $304 1 payment
  4. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $223 1 payment

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 22 drugs

Part D claims

1,196

Median for Medical Oncology: 414

Drug cost

$2,972,187

Median for Medical Oncology: $849,427

Branded share of claims

22.5%

Median for Medical Oncology: 28.5%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Kisqali Ribociclib Succinate Brand 63 $1,086,298
Ibrance Palbociclib Brand 62 $957,260
Orserdu Elacestrant Hcl Brand 15 $349,352
Truqap Capivasertib Brand 15 $344,274
Talzenna Talazoparib Tosylate Brand 11 $202,400
Exemestane Generic 56 $10,395
Anastrozole Generic 463 $8,119
Veozah Fezolinetant Brand 11 $5,888
Letrozole Generic 82 $1,772
Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen Hydrocodone/Acetaminophen Brand 48 $1,366

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 22 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 3,431 Part D prescribers listed as Medical Oncology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 112 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$984,959

Of which drugs: $915,660

Medicare patients

327

Average age 73

Services billed

39,522

231 women, 96 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 73%
Cancer 72%
Arthritis 40%
Diabetes 34%
Chronic kidney disease 27%
Osteoporosis 24%
Ischemic heart disease 22%
Depression 22%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, pembrolizumab, 1 mg J9271 Office 17 7,200 $323,228
Bcg live intravesical instillation, 1 mg J9030 Office 22 1,501 $3,136
Injection, docetaxel, 1 mg J9171 Office 13 1,140 $697
Injection, gemcitabine hydrochloride, 200 mg J9201 Office 25 233 $549
Injection, fosaprepitant, 1 mg J1453 Office 15 3,300 $345
Injection, palonosetron hcl, 25 mcg J2469 Office 18 241 $155
Injection, dexamethasone sodium phosphate, 1 mg J1100 Office 27 544 $48
Injection, ondansetron hydrochloride, per 1 mg J2405 Office 16 308 $22
Injection, diphenhydramine hcl, up to 50 mg J1200 Office 21 29 $18

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 8 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
VERZENIO
  • Lilly USA, LLC $16,007
  • Eli Lilly and Company $5,600
$21,607 — —
Trodelvy
  • Gilead Sciences, Inc. $17,031
$17,031 — —
Orserdu
  • Stemline Therapeutics Inc. $14,198
$14,198 15 —
ENHERTU
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $7,380
  • Daiichi Sankyo Inc. $46
$7,426 — —
KISQALI
  • Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $5,723
$5,723 63 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 8 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

568 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Medical Oncology in Texas

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record