Organisation paid for research Program year 2025 Source: CMS Open Payments

Wake Forest University Health Sciences

Neither a doctor nor a teaching hospital

Research payments

$45,333,874

6,645 payments

Through program year 2025, Wake Forest University Health Sciences is reported as receiving $45,333,874 in research payments, across 6,645 payments.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2025 Research $11,408,814 1,715
2024 Research $7,996,036 600
2023 Research $7,867,399 1,140
2022 Research $7,491,159 1,907
2021 Research $4,666,266 505
2020 Research $2,918,889 335
2019 Research $2,985,311 443

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Moderna TX, Inc. $6,840,116 1,912 payments
  2. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $4,217,361 59 payments
  3. Amgen Inc. $3,693,044 109 payments
  4. Renalytix AI, Inc. $2,574,602 7 payments
  5. Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $2,548,926 891 payments
  6. Aadi Bioscience, Inc. $1,609,289 266 payments
  7. Eli Lilly and Company $1,340,084 57 payments
  8. Abbott Laboratories $1,311,487 205 payments
  9. Biogen, Inc. $1,249,690 25 payments
  10. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $1,194,558 19 payments
Studies the money was for Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. A Phase 3, Randomized, Stratified, Observer-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Immunogenicity of mRNA-1273 SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine in Adults Aged 18 Years and Older $4,725,088 212 payments
  2. A Prospective Decision Impact Trial of Kidneyintelxtm in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and Existing Chronic Kidney Disease $2,430,592 5 payments
  3. Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter Trial, Assessing the Impact of Inclisiran on Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Participants With Established Cardiovascular Disease (Victorion-2 Prevent) $1,627,478 12 payments
  4. Trial of Nab-Sirolimus in Combination With Letrozole in Patients With Advanced or Recurrent Endometrioid Endometrial Cancer $1,564,589 242 payments
  5. A Phase II Multicenter, Open-Label, Single-Arm Dose Escalation Study of Asciminib Monotherapy in 2Nd Line Chronic Phase - Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia $1,322,336 5 payments
  6. An Open-Label Study to Assess the Anti-Tumor Activity and Safety of Regn1979, An Anti-Cd20 X Anti-Cd3 Bispecific Antibody, in Patients With Relapsed Or Refractory B-Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma $893,992 74 payments
  7. A Phase 3 Randomized, Open-Label Multicenter Study of Zanubrutinib (BGB-3111) Plus Anti-CD20 Antibodies Versus Lenalidomide Plus Rituximab in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Follicular or Marginal Zone Lymphoma $654,131 39 payments
  8. A Phase 3, Randomized, Observer-blind, Active-controlled Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of mRNA-1010 Candidate Seasonal Influenza Vaccine in Adults 50 Years and Older $627,902 1,211 payments
  9. Phase 1B Study of Regn5458 (Anti-Bcma X Anti-Cd3 Bispecific Antibody) Plus Other Cancer Treatments for Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma $611,156 274 payments
  10. A Phase 3, Open-Label, Randomized Study of Sonrotoclax (BGB-11417) Plus Zanubrutinib (BGB-3111) Compared With Venetoclax Plus Obinutuzumab in Patients With Previously Untreated Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia $590,550 25 payments
What the money was spent on Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Professional salary support $147,629 17 payments
  2. Patient care $125,895 60 payments
  3. Overhead $60,000 3 payments
  4. Other $6,685 4 payments

Only reported on some payments, and a payment can report more than one category, so these amounts overlap.

What you are looking at

A noncovered recipient is an organisation paid for research that is neither an individual clinician nor a teaching hospital — typically a contract research organisation, a foundation or a trial site network. They receive 81% of all reported research money, which is why they appear here at all.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record