Research study Program year 2025 Source: CMS Open Payments

A Randomized Phase 3 Double-Blinded Study Comparing the Efficacy and S

Research payments

$1,327,408

504 payments

Through program year 2025, $1,327,408 in research payments was reported against A Randomized Phase 3 Double-Blinded Study Comparing the Efficacy and S, across 504 payments, paid by GlaxoSmithKline, LLC..

Paid by
GlaxoSmithKline, LLC.
ClinicalTrials.gov
No trial number was reported for this study

By program year

5 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2025 Research $64,660 48
2024 Research $173,463 94
2023 Research $744,250 252
2022 Research $335,535 108
2021 Research $9,500 2

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $1,327,408 504 payments
Who received the money Research payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. US Oncology ResearchLLC Organisation paid for research $454,281 130 payments
  2. New Mexico Cancer Care Alliance Organisation paid for research $78,063 22 payments
  3. The Regents Of The University Of Organisation paid for research $72,128 22 payments
  4. Regents Of The University Of Colorado Organisation paid for research $68,919 34 payments
  5. US Oncology Research INC Organisation paid for research $59,775 27 payments
  6. City of Hope National Medical Center Organisation paid for research $46,894 14 payments
  7. Trustees Of Columbia University In The City Of New York Organisation paid for research $46,718 15 payments
  8. Yale University Organisation paid for research $38,896 17 payments
  9. Providence Health System Southern California Organisation paid for research $38,582 23 payments
  10. Institute for Cancer Research Organisation paid for research $34,928 11 payments

Usually the institution or organisation running the study, not a person.

Every payment, record by record

Date, amount, who was paid and what for — filter by year and kind, or download as CSV, free, in files of 5,000 rows.

Principal investigators named

10 shown

Named on the study's payments. Being named is not being paid: the money in the figures above went to the recipients listed, not necessarily to these people.

What you are looking at

Research payments are tied to a study. Being named on a study as a principal investigator is reported separately from being paid as a recipient, and the two are not the same thing — a named investigator has not necessarily received the money.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record