Organisation paid for research Program year 2025 Source: CMS Open Payments

US Oncology Research Inc

Neither a doctor nor a teaching hospital

Research payments

$18,550,671

3,760 payments

Through program year 2025, US Oncology Research Inc is reported as receiving $18,550,671 in research payments, across 3,760 payments.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2025 Research $2,413,961 789
2024 Research $2,920,183 677
2023 Research $2,078,475 504
2022 Research $5,782,221 1,026
2021 Research $1,961,501 204
2020 Research $1,463,992 122
2019 Research $1,930,338 438

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Janssen Research & Development, LLC $9,994,147 2,553 payments
  2. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $3,343,932 484 payments
  3. Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. $1,388,384 315 payments
  4. Acerta Pharma LLC $858,547 14 payments
  5. Radius Health, Inc. $766,024 96 payments
  6. Epizyme, Inc., $528,912 42 payments
  7. Puma Biotechnology, Inc. $476,694 2 payments
  8. Pfizer Inc. $341,730 123 payments
  9. TESARO, Inc. $253,119 24 payments
  10. AstraZeneca UK Limited $202,365 10 payments
Studies the money was for Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. A Phase 3, Open-label, Randomized, Prospective Study of Apalutamide Monotherapy Versus Apalutamide Plus Androgen Deprivation Therapy (ADT) in Participants Newly Diagnosed with Metastatic Castration-Sensitive Prostate Cancer (mCSPC) $1,900,774 397 payments
  2. A Phase 3 Randomized Placebo controlled Double blind Study of Niraparib in Combination with Abiraterone Acetate and Prednisone Versus Abiraterone Acetate and Prednisone for the Treatment of Participants with Deleterious Germline or Somatic Homologous Recombination Repair HRR Gene Mutated Metastatic Castration Sensitive Prostate Cancer mCSPC $1,203,143 486 payments
  3. Multicohort Study to Customize Ibrutinib Treatment Regimens for Patients with Previously Untreated Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia $1,188,835 478 payments
  4. A Study of Amivantamab and Lazertinib Combination Therapy Versus Osimertinib in Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non Small Cell Lung Cancer $1,068,771 204 payments
  5. A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Multicenter Study of Dostarlimab $1,008,453 33 payments
  6. A Phase 3, Open-Label, Randomized Study of Amivantamab and Lazertinib in Combination with Platinum-Based Chemotherapy Compared with Platinum-Based Chemotherapy in Patients with EGFR-Mutated Locally Advanced or Metastatic NonSmall Cell Lung Cancer After O $891,209 91 payments
  7. A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter S $845,757 228 payments
  8. A Phase 3, Open-Label, Randomized Study of Amivantamab and Lazertinib in Combination with Platinum-Based Chemotherapy Compared with Platinum-Based Chemotherapy in Patients with EGFR-Mutated Locally Advanced or Metastatic NonSmall Cell Lung Cancer After Osimertinib Failure $821,420 45 payments
  9. A Study of Daratumumab Plus Lenalidomide Versus Lenalidomide Alone as Maintenance Treatment in Participants With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Who Are Minimal Residual Disease Positive After Frontline Autologous Stem Cell Transplant $768,060 230 payments
  10. A Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase 3 Comparison of Platinum-Based Thera $639,280 50 payments
What the money was spent on Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Other $1,388,384 315 payments

Only reported on some payments, and a payment can report more than one category, so these amounts overlap.

What you are looking at

A noncovered recipient is an organisation paid for research that is neither an individual clinician nor a teaching hospital — typically a contract research organisation, a foundation or a trial site network. They receive 81% of all reported research money, which is why they appear here at all.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record