Research study Program year 2025 Source: CMS Open Payments

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase 3 Comparison of Platinum-Based Thera

Research payments

$46,271,609

3,824 payments

Through program year 2025, $46,271,609 in research payments was reported against A Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase 3 Comparison of Platinum-Based Thera, across 3,824 payments, paid by GlaxoSmithKline, LLC..

Paid by
GlaxoSmithKline, LLC.
ClinicalTrials.gov
No trial number was reported for this study

By program year

6 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2025 Research $2,162,935 418
2024 Research $3,020,125 486
2023 Research $6,191,033 631
2022 Research $9,470,705 604
2021 Research $10,168,916 804
2020 Research $15,257,896 881

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program years 2020–2025
  1. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $46,271,609 3,824 payments
Who received the money Research payments · program years 2020–2025
  1. US Oncology Research LLC Organisation paid for research $11,661,000 744 payments
  2. Bioclinica INC Organisation paid for research $3,914,532 248 payments
  3. Womens Cancer Care Organisation paid for research $1,811,677 101 payments
  4. University Of Rochester Organisation paid for research $1,694,230 35 payments
  5. Swedish Health Services Organisation paid for research $1,571,739 73 payments
  6. Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma Organisation paid for research $1,337,215 57 payments
  7. Research Foundation Of Suny Organisation paid for research $1,246,631 66 payments
  8. Novant Health Presb Med Center Organisation paid for research $1,101,881 34 payments
  9. Allegheny Singer Research Institute Organisation paid for research $866,008 67 payments
  10. Avera McKennan Dba Organisation paid for research $798,928 47 payments

Usually the institution or organisation running the study, not a person.

Every payment, record by record

Date, amount, who was paid and what for — filter by year and kind, or download as CSV, free, in files of 5,000 rows.

Principal investigators named

9 shown

Named on the study's payments. Being named is not being paid: the money in the figures above went to the recipients listed, not necessarily to these people.

What you are looking at

Research payments are tied to a study. Being named on a study as a principal investigator is reported separately from being paid as a recipient, and the two are not the same thing — a named investigator has not necessarily received the money.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record