Product Program year 2025 Source: CMS Open Payments

Xeljanz

Drug Gastrointestinal;Inflammation;Ophthalmology;Transplant

NDC 0069-1001-01

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$14,460,844

244,492 payments

Research payments

$46,287,467

6,371 payments

Through program year 2025, $14,460,844 in general payments and $46,287,467 in research payments were reported against Xeljanz (Gastrointestinal;Inflammation;Ophthalmology;Transplant).

No combined total These are different kinds of money, reported under different rules. A meal and a clinical trial grant do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

By program year

14 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2025 General $826,948 32,626
2025 Research $3,456,123 163
2024 General $1,363,344 45,975
2024 Research $2,127,366 257
2023 General $1,595,863 38,065
2023 Research $2,810,264 398
2022 General $1,711,815 31,877
2022 Research $4,965,377 672
2021 General $1,784,780 26,822
2021 Research $7,127,922 840
2020 General $1,944,676 14,135
2020 Research $10,825,221 1,919
2019 General $5,233,418 54,992
2019 Research $14,975,193 2,122

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Pfizer Inc. $14,277,667 243,753 payments
  2. Whitehall International Inc $115,696 24 payments
  3. Pfizer International LLC $35,842 24 payments
  4. Pfizer Pharmaceuticals LLC $13,119 78 payments
  5. PBG Puerto Rico LLC $12,183 611 payments
  6. Pfizer Chile S.A. $6,300 1 payment
  7. Pfizer Pharmaceuticals Korea Limited $36 1 payment
Top recipients General payments · program year 2025
  1. Rhonda Lambert Rheumatology · San Mateo, CA $27,975 3% · 26 payments
  2. Katherine Runyan Physician Assistant · Knoxville, TN $14,115 2% · 23 payments
  3. Arthur Mandelin Rheumatology · Chicago, IL $12,236 1% · 10 payments
  4. Gordon Lam Rheumatology · Charlotte, NC $11,849 1% · 24 payments
  5. Allan Gibofsky Rheumatology · New York, NY $11,504 1% · 5 payments

The top 5 of the 100 largest recipients; each share is of general payments naming this product in 2025.

The top 25 recipients, free in the app

Specialties paid General payments · program year 2025
  1. Rheumatology Internal Medicine $299,540 39% · 1,660 practitioners
  2. Gastroenterology Internal Medicine $225,496 29% · 3,469 practitioners
  3. Physician Assistant $62,710 8% · 800 practitioners
  4. Nurse Practitioner, Family Nurse Practitioner $61,167 8% · 989 practitioners
  5. Nurse Practitioner $32,099 4% · 466 practitioners

The top 5 of 64 specialties; each share is of general payments naming this product to practitioners with a specialty in 2025. Each practitioner is counted under their primary specialty.

The top 25 specialties, free in the app

Where the money went General payments · program year 2025
  1. California $96,020 12% · 715 recipients
  2. New York $79,992 10% · 514 recipients
  3. Florida $74,204 9% · 819 recipients
  4. Texas $51,825 6% · 640 recipients
  5. Pennsylvania $46,753 6% · 363 recipients

The top 5 of 51 states; each share is of general payments naming this product in 2025 where a state was reported.

The top 25 states, free in the app

Prescribed to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024

Part D claims

114,152

Prescriptions dispensed, refills included

Drug cost

$676,343,482

Paid at the pharmacy, in all

Medicare Part D drugs matched to XELJANZ, 2024
Part D drug Name match Relative to the largest Prescribers Claims Drug cost
Xeljanz Xr Tofacitinib Citrate Similar name 2,830 79,429 $489,943,413
Xeljanz Tofacitinib Citrate Same name 1,626 34,723 $186,400,069

Matched to this product by name; CMS does not link its files to Open Payments, so a similar name can be a different strength, form or brand. Prescriber counts include only prescribers with 11 or more claims of the drug, because CMS publishes nothing below that. Part D covers drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries at a pharmacy; it does not include drugs given in a clinic or hospital, or patients with other insurance.

Largest prescribers

First 5 of 195 by claims · 2024

Two separate records. Claims come from Medicare and related payments from Open Payments. They are shown in one row because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

The prescribers with the most Part D claims of this drug in 2024
Prescriber Specialty State Claims Drug cost Related payments
Michael Babilonia Roman Internal Medicine PR 311 $1,806,498 $93
Lalitha Ananth Rheumatology CA 275 $1,565,825 $163
Rupal Chavda Rheumatology CO 228 $1,388,695 $62
Srikanth Naramala Rheumatology CA 227 $1,410,789 $148
Faisal Chaudhary Internal Medicine NY 194 $1,186,383 $226

"No profile" means the prescriber has no Open Payments record here; "None on record" means no payment naming this product in the payment year. Related payments are general payments, and one that names several products is split evenly, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it. The list is the prescribers with the most claims, up to 100 per drug.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 195 with Patron
244,492 general · 6,371 research

Every payment, record by record

Date, amount, who was paid and what for — filter by year and kind, or download as CSV, free, in files of 5,000 rows.

What you are looking at

Manufacturers name the drug, biological or device a payment relates to. CMS does not give products their own identifiers, so a product here is assembled from how it was reported — a brand may appear under more than one spelling, and this page covers one of them rather than the brand as a whole.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record