Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Faisal Chaudhary

Rheumatology Saratoga Springs, NY Medical Doctor

NPI 1194986257 CMS profile 235470

6 Care Lane, Saratoga Springs, NY 12866

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$21,682

834 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Faisal Chaudhary of Saratoga Springs, NY is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $21,682 across 834 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 84th percentile of Rheumatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $3,244 142
2024 General $3,289 153
2023 General $3,389 156
2022 General $2,196 109
2021 General $28 2
2020 General $838 49
2019 General $8,697 223

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Faisal Chaudhary
  • Rheumatology median
  • Middle half of Rheumatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Faisal Chaudhary were reported at $3,244. Among 4,454 Rheumatology profiles paid that year, the median was $903 and the middle half received between $171 and $2,775.

Show as a table
Year Faisal Chaudhary Rheumatology median Middle half National median
2019 $8,697 $744 $153–$2,687 $163
2020 $838 $462 $98–$2,027 $114
2021 $28 $531 $101–$2,153 $132
2022 $2,196 $627 $125–$2,303 $149
2023 $3,389 $741 $145–$2,524 $160
2024 $3,289 $830 $166–$2,660 $164
2025 $3,244 $903 $171–$2,775 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $8,932 163 payments
  2. Amgen Inc. $1,801 87 payments
  3. UCB, Inc. $1,779 88 payments
  4. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $1,399 62 payments
  5. Pfizer Inc. $1,378 83 payments
  6. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $981 46 payments
  7. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $782 44 payments
  8. Mallinckrodt Hospital Products Inc. $597 21 payments
  9. Lilly USA, LLC $584 64 payments
  10. Genentech USA, Inc. $540 40 payments
  11. Other $2,909 136 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $15,936 793 payments
  2. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $5,500 4 payments
  3. Education $246 37 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. HUMIRA $4,711 27 payments
  2. RINVOQ $2,089 97 payments
  3. XELJANZ $1,287 77 payments
  4. Cimzia $1,233 66 payments
  5. TREMFYA $1,155 46 payments
  6. BENLYSTA $981 46 payments
  7. ACTHAR $597 21 payments
  8. Bimzelx $546 22 payments
  9. COSENTYX $523 31 payments
  10. Enbrel $506 22 payments
  11. Other $8,047 436 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 54 drugs

Part D claims

6,318

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$6,475,412

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

32.9%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Enbrel Sureclick Etanercept Brand 182 $1,606,363
Xeljanz Xr Tofacitinib Citrate Brand 194 $1,186,383
Humira Pen Adalimumab Brand 57 $601,540
Humira(Cf) Pen Adalimumab Brand 67 $569,292
Rinvoq Upadacitinib Brand 71 $463,328
Skyrizi Pen Risankizumab-Rzaa Brand 19 $412,126
Otezla Apremilast Brand 49 $323,842
Enbrel Etanercept Brand 27 $249,968
Humira(Cf) Adalimumab Brand 24 $184,547
Cosentyx Sensoready (2 Pens) Secukinumab Brand 18 $142,563

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 54 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 41 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$732,668

Of which drugs: $619,053

Medicare patients

488

Average age 73

Services billed

62,934

355 women, 133 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
Arthritis 75%
High blood pressure 70%
Ischemic heart disease 30%
Osteoporosis 29%
Chronic kidney disease 25%
Diabetes 24%
Depression 19%
COPD 16%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, infliximab, excludes biosimilar, 10 mg J1745 Office 11 4,030 $99,706
Injection, golimumab, 1 mg, for intravenous use J1602 Office 13 9,051 $83,045
Injection, denosumab, 1 mg J0897 Office 28 1,980 $39,601
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 28 235 $172
Infusion, normal saline solution, 250 cc J7050 Office 48 254 $131

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 37 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
RINVOQ
$420 71 —
Cimzia
$321 — —
TREMFYA
$304 — —
BENLYSTA
$244 — —
XELJANZ
$226 194 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 37 with Patron

Records

834 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Rheumatology in New York

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record