Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Lalitha Ananth

Rheumatology Huntington Beach, CA Medical Doctor

NPI 1679597033 CMS profile 257637

17822 Beach Blvd, 442, Huntington Beach, CA 92647

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$7,940

489 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$24,783 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2019–2020

Through program year 2025, Lalitha Ananth of Huntington Beach, CA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $7,940 across 489 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $24,783 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 68th percentile of Rheumatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $30 1
2024 General $1,596 81
2023 General $1,255 73
2022 General $889 60
2021 General $591 46
2020 General $1,473 77
2019 General $2,106 151

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Lalitha Ananth
  • Rheumatology median
  • Middle half of Rheumatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Lalitha Ananth were reported at $30. Among 4,454 Rheumatology profiles paid that year, the median was $903 and the middle half received between $171 and $2,775.

Show as a table
Year Lalitha Ananth Rheumatology median Middle half National median
2019 $2,106 $744 $153–$2,687 $163
2020 $1,473 $462 $98–$2,027 $114
2021 $591 $531 $101–$2,153 $132
2022 $889 $627 $125–$2,303 $149
2023 $1,255 $741 $145–$2,524 $160
2024 $1,596 $830 $166–$2,660 $164
2025 $30 $903 $171–$2,775 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Amgen Inc. $2,593 216 payments
  2. AbbVie, Inc. $1,056 46 payments
  3. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $694 41 payments
  4. Lilly USA, LLC $678 37 payments
  5. Horizon Therapeutics plc $646 43 payments
  6. Pfizer Inc. $437 27 payments
  7. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $412 14 payments
  8. Radius Health, Inc. $240 6 payments
  9. Aurinia Pharma U.S., Inc. $205 4 payments
  10. Genzyme Corporation $141 7 payments
  11. Other $837 48 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $7,831 485 payments
  2. Education $107 3 payments
  3. Travel and Lodging $2 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Enbrel Inflammation $937 84 payments
  2. Enbrel Inflammation $925 70 payments
  3. Otezla $708 51 payments
  4. RINVOQ $635 27 payments
  5. TALTZ $527 31 payments
  6. XELJANZ $420 26 payments
  7. BENLYSTA $412 14 payments
  8. Prolia $395 38 payments
  9. SIMPONI ARIA $342 20 payments
  10. KRYSTEXXA $318 23 payments
  11. Other $4,497 265 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 47 drugs

Part D claims

2,520

Median for Rheumatology: 1,511

Drug cost

$5,308,679

Median for Rheumatology: $1,139,948

Branded share of claims

42.5%

Median for Rheumatology: 28.8%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Xeljanz Xr Tofacitinib Citrate Brand 208 $1,204,426
Rinvoq Upadacitinib Brand 193 $1,173,215
Enbrel Sureclick Etanercept Brand 77 $556,219
Xeljanz Tofacitinib Citrate Brand 67 $361,399
Otezla Apremilast Brand 69 $322,450
Tremfya Guselkumab Brand 23 $307,922
Taltz Autoinjector Ixekizumab Brand 45 $298,490
Humira Pen Adalimumab Brand 31 $216,651
Prolia Denosumab Brand 125 $201,746
Benlysta Belimumab Brand 32 $142,514

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 47 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 5,224 Part D prescribers listed as Rheumatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 13 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$6,154

Of which drugs: $1,286

Medicare patients

71

Average age 75

Services billed

2,023

59 women, 12 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 75%
Osteoporosis 73%
Chronic kidney disease 56%
Diabetes 31%
Ischemic heart disease 27%
COPD 25%
Depression 25%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 1 mg J1010 Office 24 1,720 $160
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 40 mg J1030 Office 17 28 $96
Injection, denosumab, 1 mg J0897 Office 44 54 $0

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 14 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
Enbrel
  • Amgen Inc. $376
$376 77 —
TALTZ
  • Lilly USA, LLC $197
$197 45 —
RINVOQ
  • AbbVie, Inc. $190
$190 193 —
LUPKYNIS
  • Aurinia Pharma U.S., Inc. $176
$176 — —
XELJANZ
  • PFIZER INC. $163
$163 275 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 14 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

489 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Rheumatology in California

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record