Product Program year 2025 Source: CMS Open Payments

Prolia

Biological Bone Health

NDC 55513-710-01

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$17,293,219

438,995 payments

Research payments

$20,882,051

430 payments

Through program year 2025, $17,293,219 in general payments and $20,882,051 in research payments were reported against Prolia (Bone Health).

No combined total These are different kinds of money, reported under different rules. A meal and a clinical trial grant do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

By program year

14 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2025 General $1,185,327 20,892
2025 Research $383,431 14
2024 General $1,242,028 61,382
2024 Research $492,407 19
2023 General $1,786,457 58,529
2023 Research $2,283,577 21
2022 General $1,853,601 63,061
2022 Research $3,100,739 34
2021 General $2,044,652 67,675
2021 Research $4,539,847 59
2020 General $2,269,122 60,551
2020 Research $5,999,840 146
2019 General $6,912,032 106,905
2019 Research $4,082,210 137

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Amgen Inc. $17,293,219 438,995 payments
Top recipients General payments · program year 2025
  1. Hospital For Special Surgery Teaching hospital · NY $495,000 42% · 1 payment
  2. North Shore University Hospital Teaching hospital · NY $130,000 11% · 1 payment
  3. Cleveland Clinic Hospital Teaching hospital · OH $113,450 10% · 1 payment
  4. Michael McClung Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism · Portland, OR $12,972 1% · 6 payments
  5. Felicia Cosman West Haverstraw, NY $3,725 <1% · 1 payment

The top 5 of the 100 largest recipients; each share is of general payments naming this product in 2025.

The top 25 recipients, free in the app

Specialties paid General payments · program year 2025
  1. Family Medicine $73,846 17% · 2,353 practitioners
  2. Internal Medicine $69,707 16% · 1,986 practitioners
  3. Nurse Practitioner, Family Nurse Practitioner $59,712 14% · 1,771 practitioners
  4. Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism Internal Medicine $54,344 13% · 890 practitioners
  5. Rheumatology Internal Medicine $49,257 11% · 1,029 practitioners

The top 5 of 108 specialties; each share is of general payments naming this product to practitioners with a specialty in 2025. Each practitioner is counted under their primary specialty.

The top 25 specialties, free in the app

Where the money went General payments · program year 2025
  1. New York $657,051 55% · 698 recipients
  2. Ohio $124,207 10% · 332 recipients
  3. California $63,205 5% · 1,397 recipients
  4. Texas $36,177 3% · 1,044 recipients
  5. Florida $34,389 3% · 871 recipients

The top 5 of 52 states; each share is of general payments naming this product in 2025 where a state was reported.

The top 25 states, free in the app

Prescribed to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024

Part D claims

276,854

Prescriptions dispensed, refills included

Drug cost

$472,721,515

Paid at the pharmacy, in all

Prescribers

9,074

With 11 or more claims of it

Medicare Part D drugs matched to Prolia, 2024
Part D drug Name match Relative to the largest Prescribers Claims Drug cost
Prolia Denosumab Same name 9,074 276,854 $472,721,515

Matched to this product by name; CMS does not link its files to Open Payments, so a similar name can be a different strength, form or brand. Prescriber counts include only prescribers with 11 or more claims of the drug, because CMS publishes nothing below that. Part D covers drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries at a pharmacy; it does not include drugs given in a clinic or hospital, or patients with other insurance.

Largest prescribers

First 5 of 100 by claims · 2024

Two separate records. Claims come from Medicare and related payments from Open Payments. They are shown in one row because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

The prescribers with the most Part D claims of this drug in 2024
Prescriber Specialty State Claims Drug cost Related payments
Samy Metyas Rheumatology CA 784 $1,248,509 $110
Catherine Sweeney Physician Assistant NC 757 $1,316,565 $13
Noune Pashinian Rheumatology CA 559 $904,541 $46
Freda Hannafon Nurse Practitioner NY 552 $878,002 $22
Jose Aldrich Rheumatology FL 512 $901,811 $16

"No profile" means the prescriber has no Open Payments record here; "None on record" means no payment naming this product in the payment year. Related payments are general payments, and one that names several products is split evenly, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it. The list is the prescribers with the most claims, up to 100 per drug.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 100 with Patron

Given in the clinic

Part B · billing code
Medicare Part B billing codes matched to Prolia
Billing code Providers Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, denosumab, 1 mg J0897 9,797 48,156,716 $978,864,125

Drugs given by a clinician are billed to Medicare Part B, not Part D. The product is tied to a billing code through the NDC on CMS's crosswalk, which was published for a later quarter than the payments, so a code that changed in between can be missed. Providers with fewer than 11 patients for the code are not published. Medicare's payment here is what it paid for the services, to the billing practice.

438,995 general · 430 research

Every payment, record by record

Date, amount, who was paid and what for — filter by year and kind, or download as CSV, free, in files of 5,000 rows.

What you are looking at

Manufacturers name the drug, biological or device a payment relates to. CMS does not give products their own identifiers, so a product here is assembled from how it was reported — a brand may appear under more than one spelling, and this page covers one of them rather than the brand as a whole.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record