Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Jose Aldrich

Rheumatology Miami, FL Medical Doctor

NPI 1710173794 CMS profile 349699

351 Nw 42Nd Ave, Suite 404, Miami, FL 33126

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$31,968

1,330 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$211,178 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2019–2025

Through program year 2025, Jose Aldrich of Miami, FL is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $31,968 across 1,330 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $211,178 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 87th percentile of Rheumatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $3,425 146
2024 General $4,253 203
2023 General $5,277 219
2022 General $4,514 235
2021 General $4,033 204
2020 General $2,813 141
2019 General $7,653 182

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Jose Aldrich
  • Rheumatology median
  • Middle half of Rheumatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Jose Aldrich were reported at $3,425. Among 4,454 Rheumatology profiles paid that year, the median was $903 and the middle half received between $171 and $2,775.

Show as a table
Year Jose Aldrich Rheumatology median Middle half National median
2019 $7,653 $744 $153–$2,687 $163
2020 $2,813 $462 $98–$2,027 $114
2021 $4,033 $531 $101–$2,153 $132
2022 $4,514 $627 $125–$2,303 $149
2023 $5,277 $741 $145–$2,524 $160
2024 $4,253 $830 $166–$2,660 $164
2025 $3,425 $903 $171–$2,775 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Amgen Inc. $8,162 262 payments
  2. AbbVie, Inc. $4,950 219 payments
  3. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $2,332 57 payments
  4. Mallinckrodt Hospital Products Inc. $2,131 112 payments
  5. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $2,009 101 payments
  6. UCB, Inc. $1,530 88 payments
  7. Lilly USA, LLC $1,430 69 payments
  8. Pfizer Inc. $1,411 63 payments
  9. Horizon Therapeutics plc $1,289 60 payments
  10. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $1,283 50 payments
  11. Other $5,443 249 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $26,843 1,305 payments
  2. Consulting Fee $3,600 2 payments
  3. Travel and Lodging $1,108 6 payments
  4. Education $416 17 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. RINVOQ $3,073 134 payments
  2. SAPHNELO $2,203 51 payments
  3. ACTHAR $2,131 112 payments
  4. Enbrel $1,412 82 payments
  5. XELJANZ $1,411 63 payments
  6. Prolia $1,357 72 payments
  7. BENLYSTA $1,283 50 payments
  8. Otezla $1,242 81 payments
  9. COSENTYX $1,216 67 payments
  10. TALTZ $1,210 59 payments
  11. Other $15,265 789 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 74 drugs

Part D claims

11,481

Median for Rheumatology: 1,511

Drug cost

$13,502,014

Median for Rheumatology: $1,139,948

Branded share of claims

35.6%

Median for Rheumatology: 28.8%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Humira(Cf) Pen Adalimumab Brand 332 $2,322,503
Rinvoq Upadacitinib Brand 356 $2,314,762
Enbrel Sureclick Etanercept Brand 289 $2,198,762
Acthar Corticotropin Brand 12 $1,091,021
Prolia Denosumab Brand 512 $901,811
Xeljanz Xr Tofacitinib Citrate Brand 117 $685,807
Benlysta Belimumab Brand 133 $650,683
Cimzia (2 Pack) Certolizumab Pegol Brand 106 $619,044
Cosentyx Sensoready (2 Pens) Secukinumab Brand 66 $582,735
Skyrizi Pen Risankizumab-Rzaa Brand 26 $553,569

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 74 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 5,224 Part D prescribers listed as Rheumatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 13 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$47,332

Of which drugs: $1,222

Medicare patients

80

Average age 77

Services billed

8,512

51 women, 29 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 75%
Diabetes 48%
Ischemic heart disease 38%
Osteoporosis 38%
Chronic kidney disease 33%
Depression 33%
COPD 28%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 1 mg J1010 Office 62 7,729 $788
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 40 mg J1030 Office 45 96 $435

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 23 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
RINVOQ
$607 356 —
SKYRIZI
$384 26 —
ACTHAR
$351 12 —
PURIFIED CORTROPHIN GEL
$319 — —
BENLYSTA
$284 133 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 23 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

1,330 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record