Doctor of Osteopathy Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Victoriya Strukova

Rheumatology Conway, SC Doctor of Osteopathy

NPI 1801279070 CMS profile 1325456

300 Singleton Ridge Rd, Conway, SC 29526

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$19,045

934 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Victoriya Strukova of Conway, SC is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $19,045 across 934 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 82nd percentile of Rheumatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $594 21
2024 General $2,518 123
2023 General $3,264 188
2022 General $3,058 188
2021 General $2,905 162
2020 General $2,575 109
2019 General $4,130 143

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Victoriya Strukova
  • Rheumatology median
  • Middle half of Rheumatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Victoriya Strukova were reported at $594. Among 4,454 Rheumatology profiles paid that year, the median was $903 and the middle half received between $171 and $2,775.

Show as a table
Year Victoriya Strukova Rheumatology median Middle half National median
2019 $4,130 $744 $153–$2,687 $163
2020 $2,575 $462 $98–$2,027 $114
2021 $2,905 $531 $101–$2,153 $132
2022 $3,058 $627 $125–$2,303 $149
2023 $3,264 $741 $145–$2,524 $160
2024 $2,518 $830 $166–$2,660 $164
2025 $594 $903 $171–$2,775 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Amgen Inc. $3,674 200 payments
  2. AbbVie, Inc. $3,661 160 payments
  3. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $1,409 59 payments
  4. UCB, Inc. $1,386 84 payments
  5. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $1,294 67 payments
  6. Pfizer Inc. $1,116 64 payments
  7. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $1,029 60 payments
  8. Genzyme Corporation $871 17 payments
  9. Genentech USA, Inc. $751 29 payments
  10. Lilly USA, LLC $733 33 payments
  11. Other $3,120 161 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $18,503 922 payments
  2. Education $542 12 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. RINVOQ $1,443 76 payments
  2. Cimzia $1,372 83 payments
  3. BENLYSTA $1,265 57 payments
  4. HUMIRA $1,230 45 payments
  5. TREMFYA $1,202 57 payments
  6. XELJANZ $1,116 64 payments
  7. Enbrel $909 61 payments
  8. EVENITY $884 48 payments
  9. Prolia $865 58 payments
  10. COSENTYX $773 43 payments
  11. Other $11,116 547 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 32 drugs

Part D claims

2,613

Median for Rheumatology: 1,511

Drug cost

$3,718,433

Median for Rheumatology: $1,139,948

Branded share of claims

35.5%

Median for Rheumatology: 28.8%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Humira(Cf) Pen Adalimumab Brand 163 $1,566,814
Enbrel Sureclick Etanercept Brand 67 $511,877
Rinvoq Upadacitinib Brand 61 $458,018
Orencia Clickject Abatacept Brand 66 $418,608
Benlysta Belimumab Brand 42 $203,380
Enbrel Mini Etanercept Brand 26 $193,511
Kevzara Sarilumab Brand 35 $149,653
Actemra Actpen Tocilizumab Brand 21 $108,956
Prolia Denosumab Brand 29 $50,345
Hydroxychloroquine Sulfate Generic 415 $17,192

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 32 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 5,224 Part D prescribers listed as Rheumatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 115 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$1,411,190

Of which drugs: $1,202,810

Medicare patients

546

Average age 75

Services billed

154,902

427 women, 119 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 75%
Osteoporosis 49%
Chronic kidney disease 46%
Diabetes 30%
Depression 30%
Ischemic heart disease 28%
COPD 26%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, romosozumab-aqqg, 1 mg J3111 Office 30 28,980 $245,058
Injection, abatacept, 10 mg (code may be used for medicare when drug administered under the direct supervision of a physician, not for use when drug is self administered) J0129 Office 20 7,075 $239,138
Injection, tocilizumab, 1 mg J3262 Office 16 42,895 $202,417
Injection, certolizumab pegol, 1 mg (code may be used for medicare when drug administered under the direct supervision of a physician, not for use when drug is self administered) J0717 Office 25 47,200 $172,228
Injection, denosumab, 1 mg J0897 Office 92 5,940 $119,943
Injection, golimumab, 1 mg, for intravenous use J1602 Office 16 6,850 $62,867
Hyaluronan or derivative, synvisc or synvisc-one, for intra-articular injection, 1 mg J7325 Office 12 944 $6,452
Infusion, normal saline solution, 250 cc J7050 Office 75 584 $293
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 40 mg J1030 Office 13 18 $65
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 1 mg J1010 Office 17 597 $63

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 21 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
Enbrel
$404 93 —
TREMFYA
$295 — —
Cimzia
$272 — 47,200
KEVZARA
$255 35 —
SKYRIZI
$216 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 21 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

934 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record