Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2022–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Varun Bhalla

Rheumatology Peoria, AZ Medical Doctor

NPI 1568859007 CMS profile 5405634

13943 N 91St Ave, Bldg 1, Peoria, AZ 85381

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$6,677

335 records reported · program years 2022–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2022–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Varun Bhalla of Peoria, AZ is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $6,677 across 335 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 65th percentile of Rheumatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

4 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $2,644 128
2024 General $1,716 101
2023 General $2,003 92
2022 General $315 14

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Varun Bhalla
  • Rheumatology median
  • Middle half of Rheumatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Varun Bhalla were reported at $2,644. Among 4,454 Rheumatology profiles paid that year, the median was $903 and the middle half received between $171 and $2,775.

Show as a table
Year Varun Bhalla Rheumatology median Middle half National median
2019 $0 $744 $153–$2,687 $163
2020 $0 $462 $98–$2,027 $114
2021 $0 $531 $101–$2,153 $132
2022 $315 $627 $125–$2,303 $149
2023 $2,003 $741 $145–$2,524 $160
2024 $1,716 $830 $166–$2,660 $164
2025 $2,644 $903 $171–$2,775 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2022–2025
  1. Amgen Inc. $1,774 98 payments
  2. AbbVie, Inc. $1,646 83 payments
  3. UCB, Inc. $486 13 payments
  4. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $388 21 payments
  5. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $362 19 payments
  6. Pfizer Inc. $324 22 payments
  7. Radius Health, Inc. $260 11 payments
  8. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $251 13 payments
  9. Genentech USA, Inc. $163 8 payments
  10. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $150 9 payments
  11. Other $873 38 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2022–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $6,677 335 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2022–2025
  1. RINVOQ $1,253 62 payments
  2. Enbrel $510 32 payments
  3. Otezla $486 33 payments
  4. KRYSTEXXA $482 24 payments
  5. EVENITY $414 18 payments
  6. TREMFYA $388 21 payments
  7. BENLYSTA $362 19 payments
  8. Cimzia $352 9 payments
  9. XELJANZ $324 22 payments
  10. SKYRIZI $261 13 payments
  11. Other $2,750 135 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 33 drugs

Part D claims

1,941

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$912,632

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

20.2%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Octagam Immun Globg(Igg)/Malt/Iga Ov50 Brand 39 $275,491
Benlysta Belimumab Brand 27 $179,304
Humira(Cf) Pen Adalimumab Brand 15 $122,480
Enbrel Sureclick Etanercept Brand 15 $112,014
Prolia Denosumab Brand 44 $78,827
Otezla Apremilast Brand 12 $65,263
Teriparatide Generic 11 $34,739
Hydroxychloroquine Sulfate Generic 257 $13,091
Methotrexate Methotrexate Sodium Brand 228 $7,070
Leflunomide Generic 53 $4,407

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 33 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 40 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$369,012

Of which drugs: $263,779

Medicare patients

375

Average age 75

Services billed

20,229

276 women, 99 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
Arthritis 75%
High blood pressure 74%
Osteoporosis 37%
Chronic kidney disease 29%
Ischemic heart disease 28%
Depression 26%
Diabetes 24%
COPD 22%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, denosumab, 1 mg J0897 Office 45 4,500 $92,062
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 52 207 $157
Injection, diphenhydramine hcl, up to 50 mg J1200 Office 14 40 $25
Injection, vitamin b-12 cyanocobalamin, up to 1000 mcg J3420 Office 12 18 $17

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 26 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
RINVOQ
  • AbbVie, Inc. $329
$329 — —
Enbrel
  • Amgen Inc. $153
$153 15 —
BENLYSTA
  • GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $116
$116 27 —
XELJANZ
  • PFIZER INC. $112
$112 — —
SKYRIZI
  • AbbVie, Inc. $104
$104 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 26 with Patron

Records

335 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Rheumatology in Arizona

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record