Doctor of Osteopathy Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Joy Schechtman

Rheumatology Peoria, AZ Doctor of Osteopathy

NPI 1649244716 CMS profile 165768

6818 W Thunderbird Rd, Peoria, AZ 85381

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$860,187

2,562 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$9,373

Paid to them · 8 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$1,240,488 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2019–2025

Through program year 2025, Joy Schechtman of Peoria, AZ is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $860,187 across 2,562 general payments and $9,373 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $1,240,488 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 98th percentile of Rheumatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

9 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $108,304 297
2024 General $153,990 397
2024 Research $9,348 7
2023 General $124,416 345
2022 General $140,241 395
2021 General $57,747 271
2020 General $84,074 295
2020 Research $26 1
2019 General $191,415 562

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Joy Schechtman
  • Rheumatology median
  • Middle half of Rheumatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Joy Schechtman were reported at $108,304. Among 4,454 Rheumatology profiles paid that year, the median was $903 and the middle half received between $171 and $2,775.

Show as a table
Year Joy Schechtman Rheumatology median Middle half National median
2019 $191,415 $744 $153–$2,687 $163
2020 $84,074 $462 $98–$2,027 $114
2021 $57,747 $531 $101–$2,153 $132
2022 $140,241 $627 $125–$2,303 $149
2023 $124,416 $741 $145–$2,524 $160
2024 $153,990 $830 $166–$2,660 $164
2025 $108,304 $903 $171–$2,775 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Amgen Inc. $139,462 304 payments
  2. UCB, Inc. $107,309 289 payments
  3. AbbVie, Inc. $106,508 334 payments
  4. Lilly USA, LLC $93,647 256 payments
  5. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $75,241 123 payments
  6. Mallinckrodt Hospital Products Inc. $54,842 119 payments
  7. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $51,543 130 payments
  8. Horizon Therapeutics plc $40,667 131 payments
  9. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $35,571 143 payments
  10. Genzyme Corporation $26,225 47 payments
  11. Other $129,172 686 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $596,823 281 payments
  2. Consulting Fee $108,046 50 payments
  3. Travel and Lodging $59,837 383 payments
  4. Food and Beverage $49,647 1,796 payments
  5. Honoraria $44,841 20 payments
  6. Education $696 29 payments
  7. Grant $240 1 payment
  8. Gift $59 2 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Cimzia $78,159 226 payments
  2. RINVOQ $65,711 236 payments
  3. TALTZ $58,421 118 payments
  4. ACTHAR $54,842 119 payments
  5. SAPHNELO $50,255 95 payments
  6. TAVNEOS $48,083 69 payments
  7. SIMPONI ARIA $46,156 108 payments
  8. OFEV $38,331 66 payments
  9. TREMFYA $36,649 109 payments
  10. Otezla $36,135 77 payments
  11. Other $353,447 1,503 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Research payments came from Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Biocon Biologics Inc $9,348 7 payments
  2. Eli Lilly and Company $26 1 payment

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 65 drugs

Part D claims

7,079

Median for Rheumatology: 1,511

Drug cost

$2,061,090

Median for Rheumatology: $1,139,948

Branded share of claims

32.5%

Median for Rheumatology: 28.8%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Ofev Nintedanib Esylate Brand 73 $880,134
Prolia Denosumab Brand 290 $506,322
Evenity (2 Syringes) Romosozumab-Aqqg Brand 52 $126,996
Xeljanz Xr Tofacitinib Citrate Brand 21 $118,089
Humira(Cf) Adalimumab Brand 12 $89,480
Cosentyx Sensoready (2 Pens) Secukinumab Brand 12 $87,481
Tymlos Abaloparatide Brand 32 $85,304
Hydroxychloroquine Sulfate Generic 681 $27,526
Methotrexate Methotrexate Sodium Brand 1,643 $25,371
Bosentan Generic 11 $13,690

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 65 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 5,224 Part D prescribers listed as Rheumatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 46 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$10,196,312

Of which drugs: $9,249,526

Medicare patients

1,184

Average age 75

Services billed

846,967

967 women, 217 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
Arthritis 75%
Osteoporosis 75%
High blood pressure 73%
Chronic kidney disease 31%
Ischemic heart disease 29%
Depression 26%
COPD 23%
Diabetes 20%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, abatacept, 10 mg (code may be used for medicare when drug administered under the direct supervision of a physician, not for use when drug is self administered) J0129 Office 68 47,426 $1,602,728
Injection, golimumab, 1 mg, for intravenous use J1602 Office 139 121,540 $1,091,271
Injection, tocilizumab, 1 mg J3262 Office 38 194,657 $899,043
Injection, certolizumab pegol, 1 mg (code may be used for medicare when drug administered under the direct supervision of a physician, not for use when drug is self administered) J0717 Office 56 232,600 $844,105
Injection, denosumab, 1 mg J0897 Office 407 39,383 $805,871
Injection, anifrolumab-fnia, 1 mg J0491 Office 20 56,700 $764,809
Injection, romosozumab-aqqg, 1 mg J3111 Office 76 87,164 $739,752
Injection, infliximab, excludes biosimilar, 10 mg J1745 Office 108 27,377 $664,941
Injection, rituximab, 10 mg J9312 Office 16 6,410 $393,002
Hyaluronan or derivative, hymovis, for intra-articular injection, 1 mg J7322 Office 11 624 $8,308

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 32 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
TAVNEOS
$25,487 — —
ACTHAR
$21,522 — —
Bimzelx
$16,834 — —
OFEV
$13,450 73 —
Cimzia
$11,140 — 232,600

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 32 with Patron

Records

2,570 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Rheumatology in Arizona

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record