Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Thomas Pressly

Rheumatology Shreveport, LA Medical Doctor

NPI 1588779425 CMS profile 863806

2751 Albert L Bicknell Dr, Suite 2E, Shreveport, LA 71103

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$11,242

554 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$25,523 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2024–2025

Through program year 2025, Thomas Pressly of Shreveport, LA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $11,242 across 554 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $25,523 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 74th percentile of Rheumatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $1,569 74
2024 General $1,309 61
2023 General $1,456 73
2022 General $1,896 90
2021 General $1,994 96
2020 General $1,314 64
2019 General $1,704 96

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Thomas Pressly
  • Rheumatology median
  • Middle half of Rheumatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Thomas Pressly were reported at $1,569. Among 4,454 Rheumatology profiles paid that year, the median was $903 and the middle half received between $171 and $2,775.

Show as a table
Year Thomas Pressly Rheumatology median Middle half National median
2019 $1,704 $744 $153–$2,687 $163
2020 $1,314 $462 $98–$2,027 $114
2021 $1,994 $531 $101–$2,153 $132
2022 $1,896 $627 $125–$2,303 $149
2023 $1,456 $741 $145–$2,524 $160
2024 $1,309 $830 $166–$2,660 $164
2025 $1,569 $903 $171–$2,775 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Amgen Inc. $3,369 147 payments
  2. AbbVie, Inc. $1,922 94 payments
  3. Pfizer Inc. $1,883 107 payments
  4. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $913 51 payments
  5. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $760 29 payments
  6. Lilly USA, LLC $592 30 payments
  7. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $424 20 payments
  8. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $262 12 payments
  9. UCB, Inc. $233 10 payments
  10. Aurinia Pharma U.S., Inc. $201 9 payments
  11. Other $682 45 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $10,969 547 payments
  2. Education $272 7 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. XELJANZ $1,749 99 payments
  2. RINVOQ $1,276 63 payments
  3. Otezla $1,130 44 payments
  4. Prolia $975 47 payments
  5. BENLYSTA $913 51 payments
  6. EVENITY $842 42 payments
  7. Enbrel $840 33 payments
  8. TREMFYA $611 21 payments
  9. TALTZ $591 29 payments
  10. COSENTYX $504 24 payments
  11. Other $4,472 222 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 41 drugs

Part D claims

4,756

Median for Rheumatology: 1,511

Drug cost

$1,670,223

Median for Rheumatology: $1,139,948

Branded share of claims

18.8%

Median for Rheumatology: 28.8%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Enbrel Etanercept Brand 49 $410,834
Humira(Cf) Pen Adalimumab Brand 44 $353,076
Xeljanz Xr Tofacitinib Citrate Brand 34 $233,028
Humira(Cf) Adalimumab Brand 26 $232,830
Taltz Autoinjector Ixekizumab Brand 15 $196,816
Benlysta Belimumab Brand 21 $100,121
Xeljanz Tofacitinib Citrate Brand 11 $62,603
Mycophenolate Mofetil Generic 251 $16,858
Pregabalin Generic 114 $9,300
Methotrexate Methotrexate Sodium Brand 616 $9,091

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 41 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 5,224 Part D prescribers listed as Rheumatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 17 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$199,763

Of which drugs: $7,578

Medicare patients

478

Average age 74

Services billed

6,766

357 women, 121 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 75%
Osteoporosis 47%
Ischemic heart disease 28%
Diabetes 27%
Chronic kidney disease 24%
Depression 21%
Atrial fibrillation 18%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Hyaluronan or derivative, hyalgan, supartz or visco-3, for intra-articular injection, per dose J7321 Office 14 82 $4,577
Injection, betamethasone acetate 3 mg and betamethasone sodium phosphate 3 mg J0702 Office 226 608 $3,002

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 15 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
Otezla
  • Amgen Inc. $240
$240 — —
XELJANZ
  • PFIZER INC. $225
$225 45 —
Enbrel
  • Amgen Inc. $166
$166 49 —
TREMFYA
  • Janssen Biotech, Inc. $120
$120 — —
RINVOQ
  • AbbVie, Inc. $110
$110 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 15 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

554 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record