Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Tazeen Rehman

Rheumatology Baltimore, MD Medical Doctor

NPI 1427241132 CMS profile 19169

1220B E Joppa Rd, Suite 310, Baltimore, MD 21286

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$2,083

117 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Tazeen Rehman of Baltimore, MD is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $2,083 across 117 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 47th percentile of Rheumatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

5 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $648 33
2024 General $298 19
2023 General $36 2
2020 General $249 14
2019 General $851 49

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Tazeen Rehman
  • Rheumatology median
  • Middle half of Rheumatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Tazeen Rehman were reported at $648. Among 4,454 Rheumatology profiles paid that year, the median was $903 and the middle half received between $171 and $2,775.

Show as a table
Year Tazeen Rehman Rheumatology median Middle half National median
2019 $851 $744 $153–$2,687 $163
2020 $249 $462 $98–$2,027 $114
2021 $0 $531 $101–$2,153 $132
2022 $0 $627 $125–$2,303 $149
2023 $36 $741 $145–$2,524 $160
2024 $298 $830 $166–$2,660 $164
2025 $648 $903 $171–$2,775 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $469 33 payments
  2. Amgen Inc. $332 18 payments
  3. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $302 14 payments
  4. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $231 14 payments
  5. Pfizer Inc. $112 7 payments
  6. UCB, Inc. $79 3 payments
  7. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $68 3 payments
  8. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $58 3 payments
  9. Celgene Corporation $55 3 payments
  10. Invivyd Inc $52 2 payments
  11. Other $324 17 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $2,083 117 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. RINVOQ $305 25 payments
  2. ORENCIA $231 14 payments
  3. HUMIRA $186 11 payments
  4. Prolia $140 6 payments
  5. COSENTYX $136 8 payments
  6. Enbrel $131 8 payments
  7. EVENITY $106 5 payments
  8. SKYRIZI $87 4 payments
  9. BENLYSTA $68 3 payments
  10. ILARIS $61 2 payments
  11. Other $838 42 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 37 drugs

Part D claims

1,956

Median for Rheumatology: 1,511

Drug cost

$2,266,675

Median for Rheumatology: $1,139,948

Branded share of claims

32.4%

Median for Rheumatology: 28.8%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Humira(Cf) Pen Adalimumab Brand 57 $515,343
Enbrel Sureclick Etanercept Brand 39 $447,223
Ilaris Canakinumab/Pf Brand 14 $256,848
Orencia Clickject Abatacept Brand 21 $185,357
Simponi Golimumab Brand 24 $178,113
Enbrel Mini Etanercept Brand 18 $177,271
Cosentyx Sensoready (2 Pens) Secukinumab Brand 20 $138,518
Otezla Apremilast Brand 18 $136,331
Taltz Autoinjector Ixekizumab Brand 14 $95,267
Orencia Abatacept/Maltose Brand 12 $50,599

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 37 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 5,224 Part D prescribers listed as Rheumatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 60 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$1,947,055

Of which drugs: $1,745,131

Medicare patients

488

Average age 72

Services billed

163,555

375 women, 113 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 75%
Osteoporosis 35%
Depression 26%
Ischemic heart disease 25%
Diabetes 23%
Chronic kidney disease 21%
COPD 17%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, abatacept, 10 mg (code may be used for medicare when drug administered under the direct supervision of a physician, not for use when drug is self administered) J0129 Office 30 21,276 $719,278
Injection, certolizumab pegol, 1 mg (code may be used for medicare when drug administered under the direct supervision of a physician, not for use when drug is self administered) J0717 Office 18 59,600 $214,387
Injection, infliximab, excludes biosimilar, 10 mg J1745 Office 14 4,614 $114,122
Injection, golimumab, 1 mg, for intravenous use J1602 Office 20 12,100 $109,423
Injection, denosumab, 1 mg J0897 Office 35 3,240 $65,951
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90653 Office 40 41 $3,355
Injection, zoledronic acid, 1 mg J3489 Office 29 145 $710
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 57 472 $360
Injection, methylprednisolone sodium succinate, up to 125 mg J2930 Office 14 21 $92
Injection, methylprednisolone sodium succinate, 5 mg J2919 Office 17 191 $44

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 10 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
RINVOQ
  • AbbVie, Inc. $92
$92 — —
HUMIRA
  • AbbVie, Inc. $36
$36 57 —
LUPKYNIS
  • Aurinia Pharma U.S., Inc. $30
$30 — —
SKYRIZI
  • AbbVie, Inc. $29
$29 — —
ILARIS
  • Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $29
$29 14 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 10 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

117 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record