Product Program year 2025 Source: CMS Open Payments

Ilaris

Drug Immunology

NDC 0078-0734-61

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$503,886

4,376 payments

Research payments

$46,058,004

137 payments

Through program year 2025, $503,886 in general payments and $46,058,004 in research payments were reported against Ilaris (Immunology).

No combined total These are different kinds of money, reported under different rules. A meal and a clinical trial grant do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

By program year

8 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2025 General $85,453 1,629
2025 Research $21,164,761 16
2024 General $90,847 1,531
2024 Research $13,822,743 29
2023 General $129,586 1,208
2023 Research $11,070,499 92
2022 General $135,000 6
2021 General $63,000 2

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $503,886 4,376 payments
Top recipients General payments · program year 2025
  1. John Cush Rheumatology · Dallas, TX $25,000 29% · 3 payments
  2. Grant Schulert Pediatric Rheumatology · Cincinnati, OH $5,393 6% · 9 payments
  3. U Of Utah Neuropsychiatric Institute Teaching hospital · UT $5,000 6% · 1 payment
  4. Cleveland Clinic Hospital Teaching hospital · OH $3,000 4% · 1 payment
  5. University Hospital Teaching hospital · KY $2,800 3% · 4 payments

The top 5 of the 100 largest recipients; each share is of general payments naming this product in 2025.

The top 25 recipients, free in the app

Specialties paid General payments · program year 2025
  1. Rheumatology Internal Medicine $50,352 72% · 517 practitioners
  2. Pediatric Rheumatology Pediatrics $7,304 10% · 32 practitioners
  3. Physician Assistant $2,760 4% · 68 practitioners
  4. Nurse Practitioner, Family Nurse Practitioner $2,100 3% · 68 practitioners
  5. Nurse Practitioner $1,765 3% · 50 practitioners

The top 5 of 34 specialties; each share is of general payments naming this product to practitioners with a specialty in 2025. Each practitioner is counted under their primary specialty.

The top 25 specialties, free in the app

Where the money went General payments · program year 2025
  1. Texas $26,089 31% · 40 recipients
  2. Ohio $12,530 15% · 57 recipients
  3. Maryland $6,064 7% · 63 recipients
  4. Utah $5,699 7% · 17 recipients
  5. California $5,265 6% · 138 recipients

The top 5 of 35 states; each share is of general payments naming this product in 2025 where a state was reported.

The top 25 states, free in the app

Prescribed to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024

Part D claims

829

Prescriptions dispensed, refills included

Drug cost

$24,906,440

Paid at the pharmacy, in all

Prescribers

58

With 11 or more claims of it

Medicare Part D drugs matched to ILARIS, 2024
Part D drug Name match Relative to the largest Prescribers Claims Drug cost
Ilaris Canakinumab/Pf Same name 58 829 $24,906,440

Matched to this product by name; CMS does not link its files to Open Payments, so a similar name can be a different strength, form or brand. Prescriber counts include only prescribers with 11 or more claims of the drug, because CMS publishes nothing below that. Part D covers drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries at a pharmacy; it does not include drugs given in a clinic or hospital, or patients with other insurance.

Largest prescribers

First 5 of 58 by claims · 2024

Two separate records. Claims come from Medicare and related payments from Open Payments. They are shown in one row because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

The prescribers with the most Part D claims of this drug in 2024
Prescriber Specialty State Claims Drug cost Related payments
Qingping Yao Rheumatology NY 54 $1,276,963 None on record
Arturo Diaz Internal Medicine MA 26 $989,493 None on record
Terri Getzug Gastroenterology CA 25 $876,013 None on record
Andrew Gross Rheumatology CA 20 $748,975 None on record
Dirk Elston Dermatology SC 19 $328,859 None on record

"No profile" means the prescriber has no Open Payments record here; "None on record" means no payment naming this product in the payment year. Related payments are general payments, and one that names several products is split evenly, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it. The list is the prescribers with the most claims, up to 100 per drug.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 58 with Patron

Given in the clinic

Part B · billing code
Medicare Part B billing codes matched to ILARIS
Billing code Providers Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, canakinumab, 1 mg J0638 1 2,250 $210,612

Drugs given by a clinician are billed to Medicare Part B, not Part D. The product is tied to a billing code through the NDC on CMS's crosswalk, which was published for a later quarter than the payments, so a code that changed in between can be missed. Providers with fewer than 11 patients for the code are not published. Medicare's payment here is what it paid for the services, to the billing practice.

4,376 general · 137 research

Every payment, record by record

Date, amount, who was paid and what for — filter by year and kind, or download as CSV, free, in files of 5,000 rows.

What you are looking at

Manufacturers name the drug, biological or device a payment relates to. CMS does not give products their own identifiers, so a product here is assembled from how it was reported — a brand may appear under more than one spelling, and this page covers one of them rather than the brand as a whole.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record