Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Stuart Silverman

Beverly Hills, CA Medical Doctor

NPI 1679670822 CMS profile 120995

8641 Wilshire Blvd, #301, Beverly Hills, CA 90211

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$301,226

1,138 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$26,905

Paid to them · 6 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$623,210 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2019–2023

Through program year 2025, Stuart Silverman of Beverly Hills, CA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $301,226 across 1,138 general payments and $26,905 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $623,210 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

By program year

11 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $19,918 110
2024 General $10,705 118
2023 General $29,556 160
2022 General $4,870 160
2022 Research $372 1
2021 General $48,753 179
2021 Research $17,090 2
2020 General $80,823 156
2020 Research $4,112 2
2019 General $106,599 255
2019 Research $5,330 1

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Stuart Silverman
  • California median
  • Middle half of California
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Stuart Silverman were reported at $19,918. Among 98,626 California profiles paid that year, the median was $172 and the middle half received between $54 and $610.

Show as a table
Year Stuart Silverman California median Middle half National median
2019 $106,599 $161 $50–$652 $163
2020 $80,823 $114 $34–$392 $114
2021 $48,753 $137 $41–$509 $132
2022 $4,870 $152 $48–$573 $149
2023 $29,556 $162 $50–$581 $160
2024 $10,705 $162 $52–$583 $164
2025 $19,918 $172 $54–$610 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Amgen Inc. $103,494 259 payments
  2. Eli Lilly and Company $73,589 119 payments
  3. Radius Health, Inc. $65,368 158 payments
  4. Tonix Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $11,203 9 payments
  5. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $9,676 55 payments
  6. Sandoz Inc. $9,588 4 payments
  7. Pfizer Inc. $8,289 63 payments
  8. Celltrion, Inc. $6,533 2 payments
  9. AbbVie, Inc. $1,970 81 payments
  10. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $1,825 56 payments
  11. Other $9,691 332 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Consulting Fee $197,035 134 payments
  2. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $50,415 27 payments
  3. Travel and Lodging $24,643 49 payments
  4. Food and Beverage $23,556 891 payments
  5. Education $5,577 37 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. EVENITY $71,165 98 payments
  2. Prolia $26,110 92 payments
  3. Tymlos Endocrinology $25,664 64 payments
  4. Tymlos Endocrinology $16,367 52 payments
  5. TONMYA $11,203 9 payments
  6. SIMPONI ARIA $1,673 47 payments
  7. STELARA $1,470 35 payments
  8. RINVOQ $1,451 56 payments
  9. XELJANZ $997 46 payments
  10. Strensiq $928 11 payments
  11. Other $14,324 611 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Research payments came from Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Radius Health, Inc. $17,462 3 payments
  2. Amgen Inc. $6,243 2 payments
  3. Pfizer Inc. $3,200 1 payment

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 89 drugs

Part D claims

2,955

Median for Rheumatology: 1,511

Drug cost

$1,366,980

Median for Rheumatology: $1,139,948

Branded share of claims

23.2%

Median for Rheumatology: 28.8%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Forteo Teriparatide Brand 73 $334,492
Tymlos Abaloparatide Brand 78 $212,332
Teriparatide Generic 49 $172,150
Prolia Denosumab Brand 93 $157,125
Enbrel Sureclick Etanercept Brand 14 $105,843
Xeljanz Xr Tofacitinib Citrate Brand 13 $70,372
Orencia Clickject Abatacept Brand 11 $65,357
Evenity (2 Syringes) Romosozumab-Aqqg Brand 25 $60,271
Gammagard Liquid Immun Glob G(Igg)/Gly/Iga Ov50 Brand 21 $53,420
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 22 $29,197

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 89 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 5,224 Part D prescribers listed as Rheumatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 31 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$788,069

Of which drugs: $616,356

Medicare patients

498

Average age 74

Services billed

42,822

417 women, 81 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
Osteoporosis 75%
Arthritis 70%
High blood pressure 58%
Ischemic heart disease 29%
Depression 23%
Diabetes 19%
Cancer 15%
Atrial fibrillation 10%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, denosumab, 1 mg J0897 Office 213 22,684 $466,526
Injection, romosozumab-aqqg, 1 mg J3111 Office 14 17,430 $149,827

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 25 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
RINVOQ
$422 — —
COSENTYX
$327 — —
Enbrel
$266 14 —
TERIPARATIDE
$222 122 —
XELJANZ
$143 13 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 25 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

1,144 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record