Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Stephen Davidson

Hematology & Oncology Montgomery, AL Medical Doctor

NPI 1902852171 CMS profile 313580

4145 Carmichael Rd, Montgomery, AL 36106

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$4,188

232 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Stephen Davidson of Montgomery, AL is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $4,188 across 232 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 57th percentile of Hematology & Oncology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $573 29
2024 General $949 50
2023 General $754 46
2022 General $681 40
2021 General $452 27
2020 General $91 6
2019 General $687 34

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Stephen Davidson
  • Hematology & Oncology median
  • Middle half of Hematology & Oncology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Stephen Davidson were reported at $573. Among 8,769 Hematology & Oncology profiles paid that year, the median was $683 and the middle half received between $143 and $3,154.

Show as a table
Year Stephen Davidson Hematology & Oncology median Middle half National median
2019 $687 $529 $121–$2,516 $163
2020 $91 $339 $82–$2,213 $114
2021 $452 $263 $49–$1,965 $132
2022 $681 $416 $103–$2,395 $149
2023 $754 $542 $125–$2,646 $160
2024 $949 $692 $141–$3,008 $164
2025 $573 $683 $143–$3,154 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Celgene Corporation $515 27 payments
  2. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $419 22 payments
  3. Pfizer Inc. $341 24 payments
  4. Exelixis Inc. $236 4 payments
  5. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $191 13 payments
  6. Genentech USA, Inc. $187 10 payments
  7. AbbVie, Inc. $186 10 payments
  8. BeiGene USA, Inc. $165 9 payments
  9. Astellas Pharma US Inc $147 9 payments
  10. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $134 8 payments
  11. Other $1,667 96 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $4,021 225 payments
  2. Education $168 7 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. REBLOZYL $381 18 payments
  2. CABOMETYX $236 4 payments
  3. GAZYVA $156 7 payments
  4. IMBRUVICA $153 8 payments
  5. BRUKINSA $147 8 payments
  6. KEYTRUDA $134 8 payments
  7. QINLOCK $132 8 payments
  8. IBRANCE $131 9 payments
  9. Lenvima $108 2 payments
  10. Rituxan $100 1 payment
  11. Other $3,545 226 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 48 drugs

Part D claims

2,888

Median for Hematology-Oncology: 604

Drug cost

$4,151,755

Median for Hematology-Oncology: $1,306,514

Branded share of claims

46.5%

Median for Hematology-Oncology: 31.6%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Revlimid Lenalidomide Brand 111 $2,066,715
Ibrance Palbociclib Brand 28 $437,335
Pomalyst Pomalidomide Brand 16 $356,357
Jakafi Ruxolitinib Phosphate Brand 22 $354,754
Imbruvica Ibrutinib Brand 19 $216,246
Stivarga Regorafenib Brand 16 $198,656
Lonsurf Trifluridine/Tipiracil Hcl Brand 13 $198,345
Tasigna Nilotinib Hcl Brand 15 $126,838
Exemestane Generic 209 $43,100
Abiraterone Acetate Generic 14 $41,857

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 48 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 8,746 Part D prescribers listed as Hematology-Oncology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 6 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$49,818

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

384

Average age 75

Services billed

589

278 women, 106 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Cancer 59%
Arthritis 53%
Ischemic heart disease 44%
Chronic kidney disease 36%
Diabetes 35%
Osteoporosis 24%
Atrial fibrillation 23%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 34 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
REBLOZYL
  • Celgene Corporation $129
$129 — —
LIBTAYO
  • Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $82
$82 — —
PLUVICTO
  • Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $62
$62 — —
BRUKINSA
  • BeiGene USA, Inc. $56
$56 — —
MEKINIST
  • Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $39
$39 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 34 with Patron

Records

232 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Hematology & Oncology in Alabama

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record