Product Program year 2025 Source: CMS Open Payments

Gazyva

Biological BioOncology

NDC 50242-070-01

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$4,402,997

10,994 payments

Research payments

$117,872,517

6,830 payments

Through program year 2025, $4,402,997 in general payments and $117,872,517 in research payments were reported against Gazyva (BioOncology).

No combined total These are different kinds of money, reported under different rules. A meal and a clinical trial grant do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

By program year

14 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2025 General $189,563 1,309
2025 Research $12,086,703 913
2024 General $10,932 454
2024 Research $16,410,554 1,043
2023 General $94,078 910
2023 Research $22,793,422 1,054
2022 General $77,495 1,990
2022 Research $16,383,965 951
2021 General $128,280 1,188
2021 Research $13,729,244 946
2020 General $239,116 821
2020 Research $20,465,614 938
2019 General $3,663,533 4,322
2019 Research $16,003,015 985

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Genentech, Inc. $3,064,915 330 payments
  2. Genentech USA, Inc. $1,205,231 10,550 payments
  3. F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG $74,122 90 payments
  4. Roche Products Limited $56,750 23 payments
  5. Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. $1,980 1 payment
Top recipients General payments · program year 2025
  1. Kevin Winthrop Infectious Disease · Portland, OR $20,365 11% · 6 payments
  2. Gabriel Contreras Nephrology · Miami, FL $9,240 5% · 3 payments
  3. Ajay Major Hematology & Oncology · Aurora, CO $7,500 4% · 5 payments
  4. Amit Saxena Rheumatology · New York, NY $6,926 4% · 6 payments
  5. Yelena Drexler Nephrology · Miami, FL $6,688 4% · 8 payments

The top 5 of the 100 largest recipients; each share is of general payments naming this product in 2025.

The top 25 recipients, free in the app

Specialties paid General payments · program year 2025
  1. Rheumatology Internal Medicine $60,505 33% · 488 practitioners
  2. Nephrology Internal Medicine $40,062 22% · 174 practitioners
  3. Hematology & Oncology Internal Medicine $25,889 14% · 21 practitioners
  4. Infectious Disease Internal Medicine $20,365 11% · 1 practitioner
  5. Hematology Internal Medicine $14,962 8% · 4 practitioners

The top 5 of 45 specialties; each share is of general payments naming this product to practitioners with a specialty in 2025. Each practitioner is counted under their primary specialty.

The top 25 specialties, free in the app

Where the money went General payments · program year 2025
  1. New York $23,597 12% · 46 recipients
  2. California $22,547 12% · 98 recipients
  3. Florida $21,597 11% · 85 recipients
  4. Oregon $20,583 11% · 7 recipients
  5. Ohio $13,048 7% · 49 recipients

The top 5 of 48 states; each share is of general payments naming this product in 2025 where a state was reported.

The top 25 states, free in the app

Prescribed to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024

Part D claims

317

Prescriptions dispensed, refills included

Drug cost

$3,247,145

Paid at the pharmacy, in all

Prescribers

16

With 11 or more claims of it

Medicare Part D drugs matched to GAZYVA, 2024
Part D drug Name match Relative to the largest Prescribers Claims Drug cost
Gazyva Obinutuzumab Same name 16 317 $3,247,145

Matched to this product by name; CMS does not link its files to Open Payments, so a similar name can be a different strength, form or brand. Prescriber counts include only prescribers with 11 or more claims of the drug, because CMS publishes nothing below that. Part D covers drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries at a pharmacy; it does not include drugs given in a clinic or hospital, or patients with other insurance.

Largest prescribers

First 5 of 16 by claims · 2024

Two separate records. Claims come from Medicare and related payments from Open Payments. They are shown in one row because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

The prescribers with the most Part D claims of this drug in 2024
Prescriber Specialty State Claims Drug cost Related payments
Alec Goldenberg Hematology-Oncology NY 65 $567,680 None on record
Kamal Patel Hematology-Oncology AR 39 $316,639 None on record
Rene Cabeza Hematology-Oncology FL 21 $185,161 None on record
Pratibha Desai Hematology-Oncology FL 20 $324,013 None on record
Asit Choksi Hematology-Oncology TX 18 $155,651 None on record

"No profile" means the prescriber has no Open Payments record here; "None on record" means no payment naming this product in the payment year. Related payments are general payments, and one that names several products is split evenly, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it. The list is the prescribers with the most claims, up to 100 per drug.

See all 16 in the dashboard with a free account

Given in the clinic

Part B · billing code
Medicare Part B billing codes matched to GAZYVA
Billing code Providers Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, obinutuzumab, 10 mg J9301 6 39,460 $2,253,962

Drugs given by a clinician are billed to Medicare Part B, not Part D. The product is tied to a billing code through the NDC on CMS's crosswalk, which was published for a later quarter than the payments, so a code that changed in between can be missed. Providers with fewer than 11 patients for the code are not published. Medicare's payment here is what it paid for the services, to the billing practice.

10,994 general · 6,830 research

Every payment, record by record

Date, amount, who was paid and what for — filter by year and kind, or download as CSV, free, in files of 5,000 rows.

What you are looking at

Manufacturers name the drug, biological or device a payment relates to. CMS does not give products their own identifiers, so a product here is assembled from how it was reported — a brand may appear under more than one spelling, and this page covers one of them rather than the brand as a whole.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record