Physician Assistant Program year 2025 Reported 2021–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Stephen Caso

Physician Assistant Temecula, CA Physician Assistant

NPI 1083916985 CMS profile 48726

41715 Winchester Rd, Suite 101, Temecula, CA 92590

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$13,098

548 records reported · program years 2021–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2021–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Stephen Caso of Temecula, CA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $13,098 across 548 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 98th percentile of Physician Assistant profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

5 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $2,365 85
2024 General $2,939 106
2023 General $2,270 97
2022 General $2,336 111
2021 General $3,190 149

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Stephen Caso
  • Physician Assistant median
  • Middle half of Physician Assistant
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Stephen Caso were reported at $2,365. Among 68,903 Physician Assistant profiles paid that year, the median was $184 and the middle half received between $57 and $620.

Show as a table
Year Stephen Caso Physician Assistant median Middle half National median
2019 $0 $34 $17–$122 $163
2020 $0 $33 $16–$78 $114
2021 $3,190 $132 $37–$438 $132
2022 $2,336 $155 $48–$522 $149
2023 $2,270 $167 $52–$557 $160
2024 $2,939 $178 $55–$600 $164
2025 $2,365 $184 $57–$620 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $1,540 82 payments
  2. Amgen Inc. $1,165 47 payments
  3. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $855 40 payments
  4. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $809 42 payments
  5. Lilly USA, LLC $790 30 payments
  6. Gilead Sciences, Inc. $723 25 payments
  7. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $590 30 payments
  8. Novo Nordisk Inc $523 28 payments
  9. Inspire Medical Systems, Inc. $406 7 payments
  10. Exact Sciences Corporation $342 16 payments
  11. Other $5,355 201 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $13,084 547 payments
  2. Education $14 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. UBRELVY $755 38 payments
  2. TRELEGY ELLIPTA $634 31 payments
  3. BREZTRI $412 19 payments
  4. INSPIRE $406 7 payments
  5. EVENITY $402 18 payments
  6. Prolia $402 18 payments
  7. NURTEC ODT $376 12 payments
  8. Repatha $343 14 payments
  9. Cologuard Collection Kit $342 16 payments
  10. AIMOVIG $342 15 payments
  11. Other $10,478 457 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 119 drugs

Part D claims

5,234

Median for Physician Assistant: 241

Drug cost

$578,372

Median for Physician Assistant: $4,110

Branded share of claims

19.1%

Median for Physician Assistant: 19.6%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 58 $80,184
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 78 $72,159
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 50 $53,610
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 38 $51,387
Trelegy Ellipta Fluticasone/Umeclidin/Vilanter Brand 56 $45,555
Trulicity Dulaglutide Brand 31 $44,266
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 39 $35,883
Entresto Sacubitril/Valsartan Brand 13 $23,764
Januvia Sitagliptin Phosphate Brand 14 $21,841
Victoza 3-Pak Liraglutide Brand 11 $13,615

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 119 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 114,276 Part D prescribers listed as Physician Assistant; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 38 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$145,911

Of which drugs: $72,402

Medicare patients

234

Average age 76

Services billed

4,517

150 women, 84 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 61%
Arthritis 45%
Osteoporosis 27%
Depression 26%
Diabetes 22%
Ischemic heart disease 21%
Chronic kidney disease 21%
Atrial fibrillation 19%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, denosumab, 1 mg J0897 Office 33 3,300 $67,345
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90653 Office 24 24 $1,964

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 37 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
DUPIXENT
  • GENZYME CORPORATION $335
$335 — —
TZIELD
  • SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. LLC $216
$216 — —
UBRELVY
  • AbbVie, Inc. $120
$120 — —
BREZTRI
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $109
$109 11 —
AIRSUPRA
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $105
$105 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 37 with Patron

Records

548 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Physician Assistant in California

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record