Physician Assistant Program year 2025 Reported 2021–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Mikhail Alper

Physician Assistant Madera, CA Physician Assistant

NPI 1588698112 CMS profile 11182523

451 E Almond Ave, Suite 103, Madera, CA 93637

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$888,933

2,986 records reported · program years 2021–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2021–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Mikhail Alper of Madera, CA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $888,933 across 2,986 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 99th percentile of Physician Assistant profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

5 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $286,377 786
2024 General $265,602 710
2023 General $183,337 575
2022 General $112,382 540
2021 General $41,235 375

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Mikhail Alper
  • Physician Assistant median
  • Middle half of Physician Assistant
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Mikhail Alper were reported at $286,377. Among 68,903 Physician Assistant profiles paid that year, the median was $184 and the middle half received between $57 and $620.

Show as a table
Year Mikhail Alper Physician Assistant median Middle half National median
2019 $0 $34 $17–$122 $163
2020 $0 $33 $16–$78 $114
2021 $41,235 $132 $37–$438 $132
2022 $112,382 $155 $48–$522 $149
2023 $183,337 $167 $52–$557 $160
2024 $265,602 $178 $55–$600 $164
2025 $286,377 $184 $57–$620 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $207,658 734 payments
  2. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $192,954 387 payments
  3. Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $79,390 125 payments
  4. Lilly USA, LLC $58,891 112 payments
  5. Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $48,752 91 payments
  6. Aimmune Therapeutics, Inc. $48,505 138 payments
  7. Madrigal Pharmaceuticals $36,051 91 payments
  8. Gilead Sciences, Inc. $34,594 174 payments
  9. Genzyme Corporation $28,878 52 payments
  10. Phathom Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $22,097 75 payments
  11. Other $131,161 1,007 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $627,219 314 payments
  2. Travel and Lodging $90,978 351 payments
  3. Consulting Fee $63,524 42 payments
  4. Food and Beverage $60,137 2,241 payments
  5. Compensation for serving as faculty or as a speaker for a medical education program $38,220 24 payments
  6. Honoraria $8,700 10 payments
  7. Education $155 4 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. TREMFYA $162,770 200 payments
  2. STELARA $117,814 264 payments
  3. CREON $89,729 264 payments
  4. ZENPEP $66,788 151 payments
  5. DUPIXENT Inflammation And Immunology $57,471 80 payments
  6. OMVOH $43,115 60 payments
  7. OCALIVA $39,254 65 payments
  8. MAVYRET $33,841 137 payments
  9. DUPIXENT Immunology $26,966 48 payments
  10. REZDIFFRA $24,852 66 payments
  11. Other $243,704 1,752 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 35 drugs

Part D claims

2,477

Median for Physician Assistant: 241

Drug cost

$3,094,522

Median for Physician Assistant: $4,110

Branded share of claims

45%

Median for Physician Assistant: 19.6%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Zenpep Lipase/Protease/Amylase Brand 130 $701,638
Stelara Ustekinumab Brand 29 $689,893
Xifaxan Rifaximin Brand 96 $328,697
Creon Lipase/Protease/Amylase Brand 103 $313,204
Linzess Linaclotide Brand 158 $170,509
Livdelzi Seladelpar Lysine Brand 12 $154,343
Iqirvo Elafibranor Brand 13 $146,004
Rinvoq Upadacitinib Brand 20 $131,596
Ocaliva Obeticholic Acid Brand 14 $115,216
Remicade Infliximab Brand 18 $88,274

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 35 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 114,276 Part D prescribers listed as Physician Assistant; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 10 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$21,042

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

223

Average age 69

Services billed

243

114 women, 109 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Diabetes 55%
Arthritis 45%
Chronic kidney disease 29%
Ischemic heart disease 26%
Depression 21%
Heart failure 19%
COPD 17%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 36 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
TREMFYA
$45,828 — —
STELARA
$38,314 29 —
CREON
$30,328 103 —
OMVOH
$28,053 — —
ZENPEP
$20,273 130 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 36 with Patron

Records

2,986 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Physician Assistant in California

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record