Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Song Zang

Rheumatology Fort Smith, AR Medical Doctor

NPI 1821203233 CMS profile 355852

708 Lexington Ave, Fort Smith, AR 72901

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$14,615

870 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$6,919 paid to institutions, not to them · program year 2019

Through program year 2025, Song Zang of Fort Smith, AR is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $14,615 across 870 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $6,919 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 78th percentile of Rheumatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $915 50
2024 General $1,468 73
2023 General $3,833 197
2022 General $2,684 171
2021 General $2,439 167
2020 General $1,451 100
2019 General $1,824 112

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Song Zang
  • Rheumatology median
  • Middle half of Rheumatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Song Zang were reported at $915. Among 4,454 Rheumatology profiles paid that year, the median was $903 and the middle half received between $171 and $2,775.

Show as a table
Year Song Zang Rheumatology median Middle half National median
2019 $1,824 $744 $153–$2,687 $163
2020 $1,451 $462 $98–$2,027 $114
2021 $2,439 $531 $101–$2,153 $132
2022 $2,684 $627 $125–$2,303 $149
2023 $3,833 $741 $145–$2,524 $160
2024 $1,468 $830 $166–$2,660 $164
2025 $915 $903 $171–$2,775 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Amgen Inc. $3,579 220 payments
  2. AbbVie, Inc. $2,231 139 payments
  3. Pfizer Inc. $1,215 79 payments
  4. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $1,026 45 payments
  5. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $1,023 63 payments
  6. UCB, Inc. $763 44 payments
  7. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $736 49 payments
  8. Lilly USA, LLC $655 50 payments
  9. Horizon Therapeutics plc $571 31 payments
  10. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $403 26 payments
  11. Other $2,413 124 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $14,023 859 payments
  2. Consulting Fee $420 5 payments
  3. Education $171 6 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. EVENITY $1,672 117 payments
  2. Prolia $1,523 122 payments
  3. RINVOQ $1,455 94 payments
  4. XELJANZ $1,147 76 payments
  5. BENLYSTA $917 44 payments
  6. SIMPONI ARIA $782 54 payments
  7. Cimzia $748 43 payments
  8. Otezla $734 38 payments
  9. Enbrel $723 33 payments
  10. TALTZ $610 44 payments
  11. Other $8,834 528 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 77 drugs

Part D claims

8,497

Median for Rheumatology: 1,511

Drug cost

$1,804,265

Median for Rheumatology: $1,139,948

Branded share of claims

26.9%

Median for Rheumatology: 28.8%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Humira(Cf) Pen Adalimumab Brand 74 $584,905
Enbrel Sureclick Etanercept Brand 53 $395,254
Rinvoq Upadacitinib Brand 33 $211,105
Xeljanz Xr Tofacitinib Citrate Brand 35 $199,007
Taltz Autoinjector Ixekizumab Brand 15 $103,388
Cosentyx Sensoready (2 Pens) Secukinumab Brand 11 $88,738
Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen Hydrocodone/Acetaminophen Brand 1,189 $37,683
Buprenorphine Generic 60 $16,557
Savella Milnacipran Hcl Brand 20 $13,778
Celecoxib Generic 515 $12,520

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 77 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 5,224 Part D prescribers listed as Rheumatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 66 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$239,345

Of which drugs: $181,845

Medicare patients

550

Average age 70

Services billed

16,328

427 women, 123 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 75%
Depression 38%
Osteoporosis 38%
Ischemic heart disease 30%
Diabetes 27%
COPD 24%
Chronic kidney disease 23%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, denosumab, 1 mg J0897 Office 65 3,900 $75,250
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 80 mg J1040 Office 19 24 $138

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 29 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
Enbrel
  • Amgen Inc. $132
$132 53 —
TREMFYA
  • Janssen Biotech, Inc. $129
$129 — —
RINVOQ
  • AbbVie, Inc. $106
$106 33 —
XELJANZ
  • PFIZER INC. $98
$98 35 —
Otezla
  • Amgen Inc. $94
$94 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 29 with Patron

Records

870 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Rheumatology in Arkansas

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record