Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Shabnam Ali

Rheumatology Columbia, MD Medical Doctor

NPI 1487837837 CMS profile 1231228

6350 Stevens Forest Rd Ste 101, Columbia, MD 21046

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$19,753

1,008 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Shabnam Ali of Columbia, MD is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $19,753 across 1,008 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 82nd percentile of Rheumatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $3,764 164
2024 General $3,453 150
2023 General $3,767 171
2022 General $3,206 182
2021 General $2,823 186
2020 General $1,222 71
2019 General $1,518 84

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Shabnam Ali
  • Rheumatology median
  • Middle half of Rheumatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Shabnam Ali were reported at $3,764. Among 4,454 Rheumatology profiles paid that year, the median was $903 and the middle half received between $171 and $2,775.

Show as a table
Year Shabnam Ali Rheumatology median Middle half National median
2019 $1,518 $744 $153–$2,687 $163
2020 $1,222 $462 $98–$2,027 $114
2021 $2,823 $531 $101–$2,153 $132
2022 $3,206 $627 $125–$2,303 $149
2023 $3,767 $741 $145–$2,524 $160
2024 $3,453 $830 $166–$2,660 $164
2025 $3,764 $903 $171–$2,775 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Amgen Inc. $4,270 182 payments
  2. AbbVie, Inc. $2,276 192 payments
  3. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $2,038 94 payments
  4. UCB, Inc. $1,626 74 payments
  5. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $1,587 77 payments
  6. Pfizer Inc. $1,459 83 payments
  7. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $799 31 payments
  8. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $764 35 payments
  9. Horizon Therapeutics plc $542 22 payments
  10. Mallinckrodt Hospital Products Inc. $512 26 payments
  11. Other $3,878 192 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $19,752 1,007 payments
  2. Education $1 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. RINVOQ $1,474 128 payments
  2. Otezla $1,404 50 payments
  3. Enbrel Inflammation $1,293 46 payments
  4. XELJANZ $1,242 69 payments
  5. Cimzia $1,100 50 payments
  6. Enbrel Inflammation $1,034 43 payments
  7. TREMFYA $1,025 50 payments
  8. Prolia $962 47 payments
  9. EVENITY $837 45 payments
  10. BENLYSTA $799 31 payments
  11. Other $13,660 677 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 12 drugs

Part D claims

563

Median for Rheumatology: 1,511

Drug cost

$99,022

Median for Rheumatology: $1,139,948

Branded share of claims

27.9%

Median for Rheumatology: 28.8%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Enbrel Sureclick Etanercept Brand 12 $89,569
Methotrexate Methotrexate Sodium Brand 145 $3,673
Hydroxychloroquine Sulfate Generic 66 $1,755
Leflunomide Generic 24 $1,144
Mycophenolate Mofetil Generic 18 $811
Prednisone Generic 105 $667
Alendronate Sodium Generic 68 $477
Allopurinol Generic 43 $269
Folic Acid Generic 35 $227
Cyclobenzaprine Hcl Generic 18 $208

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 12 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 5,224 Part D prescribers listed as Rheumatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 55 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$804,387

Of which drugs: $688,308

Medicare patients

237

Average age 74

Services billed

73,768

181 women, 56 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
Arthritis 75%
High blood pressure 72%
Osteoporosis 43%
Diabetes 30%
Ischemic heart disease 24%
Chronic kidney disease 19%
Depression 19%
Atrial fibrillation 17%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, certolizumab pegol, 1 mg (code may be used for medicare when drug administered under the direct supervision of a physician, not for use when drug is self administered) J0717 Office 14 37,200 $133,477
Injection, denosumab, 1 mg J0897 Office 58 5,460 $109,293
Injection, infliximab, excludes biosimilar, 10 mg J1745 Office 14 3,855 $95,679
Infusion, normal saline solution, 250 cc J7050 Office 41 209 $108
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 19 80 $55

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 37 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
Cimzia
$247 — 37,200
Enbrel
$235 12 —
ILARIS
$218 — —
COSENTYX
$205 — —
XELJANZ
$205 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 37 with Patron

Records

1,008 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Rheumatology in Maryland

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record